Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cardiogenic shock in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: Another area of sex disparity?

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) carries significant morbidity and mortality, despite advances in pharmacological, mechanical and reperfusion therapies. Studies suggest that there is evidence of sex disparities in the risk profile, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating AMI. Compared with men, women tend to have more comorbidities, greater variability in symptom presentation and are less likely to receive timely revascularization and mechanical circulatory support. These factors might explain why women tend to have worse outcomes. In this review, we highlight sex-based differences in the prevalence, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock due to AMI, and discuss potential ways to mitigate them.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)170-176
Number of pages7
JournalWorld Journal of Cardiology
Volume13
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 26 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.

Keywords

  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Morbidity
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Sex

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cardiogenic shock in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: Another area of sex disparity?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this