Categorical Versus Dimensional Status of Borderline Personality Disorder

Timothy J. Trull, Thomas A. Widiger, Pamela Guthrie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

112 Scopus citations

Abstract

One of the many controversies concerning the borderline personality disorder (BPD) diagnosis is whether the construct refers to a categorical or dimensional variable. The current study used Meehl's (1973) maximum covariance analysis to investigate this issue. The charts of 409 psychiatric inpatients were systematically reviewed for the presence of BPD and dysthymic symptoms. Charts of 244 inpatients were also reviewed to assess the presence of indicators of male sex, a categorical variable. The results for BPD and dysthymia were consistent with a dimensional model, whereas those for male sex were consistent with a categorical model. A dimensional model of classification of BPD is recommended, and suggestions for future research are provided.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)40-48
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Abnormal Psychology
Volume99
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1990

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Categorical Versus Dimensional Status of Borderline Personality Disorder'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this