TY - JOUR
T1 - Causes, location, and timing of relapse following rigid fixation after mandibular advancement
AU - Gassmann, Carl J.
AU - Van Sickels, Joseph E.
AU - Thrash, William J.
PY - 1990/5
Y1 - 1990/5
N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate two different groups of patients who underwent bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement. One group demonstrated no relapse, whereas a second group had documented relapse. The following questions were asked: 1) What factors contribute to relapse? 2) At what site in the mandible is movement seen? and 3) During what period does movement occur? A retrospective lateral cephalometric serial analysis was performed on 50 patients at multiple time intervals. Criteria for a candidate include 1) mandibular advancement surgery with rigid fixation, with or without genioplasty, 2) no maxillary surgery, and 3) relapse of 25% or more of the advancement. Of the 50 patients analyzed, 13 (26%) showed relapse of 25% or more and served as the relapse group. Twelve patients showed no relapse and served as the comparison group. Multiple-regression analysis for the relapse group showed that magnitude of advancement, increasing gonial arc and changing mandibular plane significantly accounted for 84.9% of the variance observed in relapse (P < .001). Repeated-measures ANOVA showed that the majority of relapse occurred in the first 6 weeks after surgery (68%, P < .05). Results of a paired t test showed that a significant change occurred in all the linear and angular measures except SN-AR-GO (P < .05).
AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate two different groups of patients who underwent bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement. One group demonstrated no relapse, whereas a second group had documented relapse. The following questions were asked: 1) What factors contribute to relapse? 2) At what site in the mandible is movement seen? and 3) During what period does movement occur? A retrospective lateral cephalometric serial analysis was performed on 50 patients at multiple time intervals. Criteria for a candidate include 1) mandibular advancement surgery with rigid fixation, with or without genioplasty, 2) no maxillary surgery, and 3) relapse of 25% or more of the advancement. Of the 50 patients analyzed, 13 (26%) showed relapse of 25% or more and served as the relapse group. Twelve patients showed no relapse and served as the comparison group. Multiple-regression analysis for the relapse group showed that magnitude of advancement, increasing gonial arc and changing mandibular plane significantly accounted for 84.9% of the variance observed in relapse (P < .001). Repeated-measures ANOVA showed that the majority of relapse occurred in the first 6 weeks after surgery (68%, P < .05). Results of a paired t test showed that a significant change occurred in all the linear and angular measures except SN-AR-GO (P < .05).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025332674&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025332674&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0278-2391(90)90229-U
DO - 10.1016/0278-2391(90)90229-U
M3 - Article
C2 - 2329394
AN - SCOPUS:0025332674
SN - 0278-2391
VL - 48
SP - 450
EP - 454
JO - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
IS - 5
ER -