CBD Oil Concentration and Hemp Flower Drying Preferences of U.S. Consumers

Benjamin D.J. Jacobs, Michael P. Popp, Sunjin Ahn, Wim Verbeke, Brandon R. McFadden, Tyler B. Mark, Adam N. Rabinowitz, Benjamin L. Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The method used to dry hemp flowers can impact the concentration of cannabidiol (CBD) and other quality characteristics like mold levels in CBD oil. Understanding consumer preferences is vital for hemp producers and processors because there is variation in drying time, energy use, and capital investment between potential drying methods. This research assesses willingness to pay (WTP) for CBD oil at varying CBD content (mg per 1-oz.(30 mL) bottle) and drying methods to better understand consumer preferences and how consumers make tradeoffs between CBD oil attributes. Specifically, the authors elicit preferences toward drying using: i) controlled ambient conditions (air-drying), ii) infrared radiation (IR), and iii) freeze-drying or lyophilization. Few statistically significant WTP differences between CBD oils, when marketed at average attribute levels, were found for higher or lower CBD concentration or drying method. An exception was respondents 55 years of age or older who had a higher WTP for CBD oil with greater CBD content (2,500 mg) and also preferred the freeze-dried product over the baseline of a conventionally air-dried product with 1,000 mg of CBD. The lack of distinct preferences among the majority of consumers suggests that producers and processors can choose alternative drying methods based on their cost, time, and energy constraints without risking a WTP penalty. The findings indicate that consumers do not have well-formed preferences for CBD oil as it is a relatively novel product. Yet, the results suggest that consumers may interpret higher prices to reflect higher quality/product safety, thereby offering perceived quality assurance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)82-95
Number of pages14
JournalResearch on World Agricultural Economy
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the author(s).

Funding

cant differences. Much of that \uD000inding was a result of This research was funded by the Agricultural Mar- reporting a statistically signi \uD000icant positive coef \uD000icientketing Service of the United Stated Department of Ag- estimate on price in the utility function. This suggests riculture, project USDA-AMS-TM-FSMIP-G-20-0004. that signi \uD000icant uncertainty exists about CBD oil given its recent market reintroduction. Also, consumers may interpret higher prices to re \uD000lect higher quality/ product safety, thereby offering perceived quality as- surance. The results further suggested that the drying method used on hemp ?lowers for CBD oil production combined with CBD content did not signi ?icantly m-at ter to CBD consumers, except for consumers 55 years of age or older who are willing to pay more the higher the CBD content using freeze-dried \uD000lowers. Noneth-e less, for all the other tested consumer categories, the results, although limited in their interpretation, show This research was funded by the Agricultural Marketing Service of the United Stated Department of Agriculture, project USDA-AMS-TM-FSMIP-G-20-0004.

FundersFunder number
Agricultural Mar
Agricultural Marketing Service of the United Stated Department of AgricultureUSDA-AMS-TM-FSMIP-G-20-0004

    Keywords

    • CBD concentration
    • CBD oil
    • Cannabidiol (CBD)
    • Choice experiment
    • Hemp flower drying

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
    • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
    • Economics and Econometrics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'CBD Oil Concentration and Hemp Flower Drying Preferences of U.S. Consumers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this