Cell elasticity with altered cytoskeletal architectures across multiple cell types

Martha E. Grady, Russell J. Composto, David M. Eckmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

110 Scopus citations

Abstract

The cytoskeleton is primarily responsible for providing structural support, localization and transport of organelles, and intracellular trafficking. The structural support is supplied by actin filaments, microtubules, and intermediate filaments, which contribute to overall cell elasticity to varying degrees. We evaluate cell elasticity in five different cell types with drug-induced cytoskeletal derangements to probe how actin filaments and microtubules contribute to cell elasticity and whether it is conserved across cell type. Specifically, we measure elastic stiffness in primary chondrocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial cells (HUVEC), hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HUH-7), and fibrosarcoma cells (HT 1080) subjected to two cytoskeletal destabilizers: cytochalasin D and nocodazole, which disrupt actin and microtubule polymerization, respectively. Elastic stiffness is measured by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and the disruption of the cytoskeleton is confirmed using fluorescence microscopy. The two cancer cell lines showed significantly reduced elastic moduli values (~0.5 kPa) when compared to the three healthy cell lines (~2 kPa). Non-cancer cells whose actin filaments were disrupted using cytochalasin D showed a decrease of 60-80% in moduli values compared to untreated cells of the same origin, whereas the nocodazole-treated cells showed no change in elasticity. Overall, we demonstrate actin filaments contribute more to elastic stiffness than microtubules but this result is cell type dependent. Cancer cells behaved differently, exhibiting increased stiffness as well as stiffness variability when subjected to nocodazole. We show that disruption of microtubule dynamics affects cancer cell elasticity, suggesting therapeutic drugs targeting microtubules be monitored for significant elastic changes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)197-207
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Volume61
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge our funding sources: NSF-NSEC Grant DMR08-32802 (RJC), URF 4-000002-4820 (DME), ONR Grant N000141410538 (DME), and the Provost׳s Postdoctoral Fellowship for Academic Diversity (MEG) , which made this work possible. The work was performed at and supported by the Nano Bio Interface Center at the University of Pennsylvania through an instrumentation Grant, DBI-0721913 , and DMR-0425780 . We also thank Judith Kandel for cell culture training and Dr. Matt Brukman and Dr. Matt Caporizzo for instrument support. We thank the following for their generous donations: Dr. Robert Mauck (chondrocytes), Dr. Ben Stanger (HUH-7), and Dr. Bruce Malkowicz (HT-1080).

FundersFunder number
MEG Energy Corporation
NSF NSECDMR08-32802, URF 4-000002-4820
Nano Bio Interface Center
Provost׳s Postdoctoral Fellowship for Academic Diversity
Office of Naval Research Naval AcademyN000141410538
The Pennsylvania State UniversityDMR-0425780, DBI-0721913

    Keywords

    • Atomic force microscopy
    • Cancer
    • Cell mechanics
    • Cytoskeleton
    • Elasticity

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Biomaterials
    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Mechanics of Materials

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cell elasticity with altered cytoskeletal architectures across multiple cell types'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this