Abstract
The cytoskeleton is primarily responsible for providing structural support, localization and transport of organelles, and intracellular trafficking. The structural support is supplied by actin filaments, microtubules, and intermediate filaments, which contribute to overall cell elasticity to varying degrees. We evaluate cell elasticity in five different cell types with drug-induced cytoskeletal derangements to probe how actin filaments and microtubules contribute to cell elasticity and whether it is conserved across cell type. Specifically, we measure elastic stiffness in primary chondrocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial cells (HUVEC), hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HUH-7), and fibrosarcoma cells (HT 1080) subjected to two cytoskeletal destabilizers: cytochalasin D and nocodazole, which disrupt actin and microtubule polymerization, respectively. Elastic stiffness is measured by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and the disruption of the cytoskeleton is confirmed using fluorescence microscopy. The two cancer cell lines showed significantly reduced elastic moduli values (~0.5 kPa) when compared to the three healthy cell lines (~2 kPa). Non-cancer cells whose actin filaments were disrupted using cytochalasin D showed a decrease of 60-80% in moduli values compared to untreated cells of the same origin, whereas the nocodazole-treated cells showed no change in elasticity. Overall, we demonstrate actin filaments contribute more to elastic stiffness than microtubules but this result is cell type dependent. Cancer cells behaved differently, exhibiting increased stiffness as well as stiffness variability when subjected to nocodazole. We show that disruption of microtubule dynamics affects cancer cell elasticity, suggesting therapeutic drugs targeting microtubules be monitored for significant elastic changes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 197-207 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials |
Volume | 61 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 1 2016 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 Elsevier Ltd.
Funding
The authors gratefully acknowledge our funding sources: NSF-NSEC Grant DMR08-32802 (RJC), URF 4-000002-4820 (DME), ONR Grant N000141410538 (DME), and the Provost׳s Postdoctoral Fellowship for Academic Diversity (MEG) , which made this work possible. The work was performed at and supported by the Nano Bio Interface Center at the University of Pennsylvania through an instrumentation Grant, DBI-0721913 , and DMR-0425780 . We also thank Judith Kandel for cell culture training and Dr. Matt Brukman and Dr. Matt Caporizzo for instrument support. We thank the following for their generous donations: Dr. Robert Mauck (chondrocytes), Dr. Ben Stanger (HUH-7), and Dr. Bruce Malkowicz (HT-1080).
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
MEG Energy Corporation | |
NSF NSEC | DMR08-32802, URF 4-000002-4820 |
Nano Bio Interface Center | |
Provost׳s Postdoctoral Fellowship for Academic Diversity | |
Office of Naval Research Naval Academy | N000141410538 |
The Pennsylvania State University | DMR-0425780, DBI-0721913 |
Keywords
- Atomic force microscopy
- Cancer
- Cell mechanics
- Cytoskeleton
- Elasticity
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Biomaterials
- Biomedical Engineering
- Mechanics of Materials