TY - JOUR
T1 - Changes in chemistry of vitrinite in coal through time
T2 - Insights from organic functional group characteristics
AU - Mastalerz, Maria
AU - Drobniak, Agnieszka
AU - Hower, James C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/2/15
Y1 - 2021/2/15
N2 - Is the signature of the original plant communities preserved in coal, or is that signature overprinted by depositional and diagenetic processes? To address this question, Pennsylvanian coals from the Illinois and Appalachian basins were compared to Cretaceous, Paleocene, and Eocene coals of comparable coalification levels as shown by vitrinite reflectance. Three reflectance intervals—0.52–0.55, 0.58–0.62, and 0.68–0.71%—were considered, and in total 51 samples were analyzed. Although data on proximate and ultimate analyses and petrographic composition were compared on whole coal samples, the maceral vitrinite was the main target of this comparison because’ aside from being the dominant component of all the samples, it offers the best chance to preserve the signature of the original woody material. An in-situ micro-FTIR technique was used to collect data on the functional group distribution of vitrinite, and FTIR-derived parameters were compared between different age groups with a special emphasis on the differences between Pennsylvanian and the Cretaceous vitrinite. The main difference between Cretaceous and Pennsylvanian coals is reflected in their oxygen content, which is higher for the Cretaceous coals. On the functional group level, the only significant difference was detected in the CH2/CH3 ratio, which had higher values for vitrinite in the Cretaceous samples. Other parameters both within the coal and the vitrinite showed comparable scatter within age groups as those between the age groups. It is suggested that oxygen content in coal and CH2/CH3 ratio in vitrinite reflect differences in the original biomass, and the variations in other parameters such as C, H, N, volatile matter, calorific value, or the majority of FTIR-derived parameters are a function of both depositional and post-depositional factors.
AB - Is the signature of the original plant communities preserved in coal, or is that signature overprinted by depositional and diagenetic processes? To address this question, Pennsylvanian coals from the Illinois and Appalachian basins were compared to Cretaceous, Paleocene, and Eocene coals of comparable coalification levels as shown by vitrinite reflectance. Three reflectance intervals—0.52–0.55, 0.58–0.62, and 0.68–0.71%—were considered, and in total 51 samples were analyzed. Although data on proximate and ultimate analyses and petrographic composition were compared on whole coal samples, the maceral vitrinite was the main target of this comparison because’ aside from being the dominant component of all the samples, it offers the best chance to preserve the signature of the original woody material. An in-situ micro-FTIR technique was used to collect data on the functional group distribution of vitrinite, and FTIR-derived parameters were compared between different age groups with a special emphasis on the differences between Pennsylvanian and the Cretaceous vitrinite. The main difference between Cretaceous and Pennsylvanian coals is reflected in their oxygen content, which is higher for the Cretaceous coals. On the functional group level, the only significant difference was detected in the CH2/CH3 ratio, which had higher values for vitrinite in the Cretaceous samples. Other parameters both within the coal and the vitrinite showed comparable scatter within age groups as those between the age groups. It is suggested that oxygen content in coal and CH2/CH3 ratio in vitrinite reflect differences in the original biomass, and the variations in other parameters such as C, H, N, volatile matter, calorific value, or the majority of FTIR-derived parameters are a function of both depositional and post-depositional factors.
KW - Coal
KW - Cretaceous
KW - Micro-FTIR
KW - Pennsylvanian
KW - Vitrinite
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100426651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100426651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.coal.2021.103690
DO - 10.1016/j.coal.2021.103690
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85100426651
SN - 0166-5162
VL - 235
JO - International Journal of Coal Geology
JF - International Journal of Coal Geology
M1 - 103690
ER -