Abstract
Traditional urban renewal scholarship has emphasized the experiences of America’s largest cities, leaving the equally significant story of urban renewal in small cities largely unexplored. This is particularly surprising, given that the overwhelming majority of communities to have received urban renewal funds had populations of less than 50,000. This article uses the state of Kentucky to develop a framework for analyzing the effects of the federal urban renewal program on small cities in the United States. Of particular importance for this research is recognizing the value of the June 30, 1974, Urban Renewal Directory as a data source.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 200-221 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Journal of Planning History |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 1 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016, © 2016 The Author(s).
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- Appalachia
- affordable housing
- housing and home finance agency
- places
- planning eras/approaches
- postwar planning
- small cities
- urban renewal
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Changing the Scale of Analysis for Urban Renewal Research: Small Cities, the State of Kentucky, and the 1974 Urban Renewal Directory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver