Chemotherapy, early surgical reassessment, and hyperfractionated abdominal radiotherapy in stage III ovarian cancer: Results of a gynecologic oncology group study

Marcus E. Randall, Rolland J. Barrett, Nick M. Spirtos, Eva Chalas, Howard D. Homesley, Samuel L. Lentz, Mark Hanna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To determine outcomes and treatment toxicities in patients with optimal (≤ 1 cm residual) Stage III ovarian carcinoma treated with three courses of cisplatin-cyclophosphamide, surgical reassessment (SRA), and hyperfractionated whole abdominal irradiation (WAI). Methods and Materials: Forty-two eligible patients entered this prospective Phase II study conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG). Disease characteristics were as follows: age range, 32-76 years (median 58); Stage IIIA (n = 1, 2%), IIIB (n = 2, 5%), IIIC (n = 39, 93%); histology-serous papillary (n = 21, 50%); other (n = 21, 50%); Grade 1 (n = 1, 2%); 2 (n = 14, 33%); 3 (n = 27, 54%); residual disease after initial surgery (present: n = 23, 55%; absent: n = 19, 45%). Five patients progressed while on chemotherapy, could not he effectively cytoreduced, and were not eligible for WAI. Of the remaining 37 patients, 35 received WAI. Surgical reassessment was not performed in five patients. Results: Of 37 patients with known SRA status after chemotherapy, 21 (57%) were grossly positive, 4 (11%) were microscopically positive, and 12 (32%) were negative. Based on measurements recorded following initial laparotomy and surgical reassessment, progression during chemotherapy was noted in 40%, stage disease in 37%, and objective response in 23%. Toxicity during hyperfractionated WAI was limited and reversible. No patient beginning WAI failed to complete or required a significant treatment break. Following WAI, six patients underwent laparotomies for abdominal symptoms; five bad recurrent disease. Five additional patients were managed conservatively for small bowel obstruction (SBO) or malabsorption, of whom three subsequently developed recurrence. Twenty-two patients having pelvic boosts were significantly more likely to require management for gastrointestinal morbidity (p = 0.0021). Considering all eligible patients, median disease- free and overall survivals were 18.5 and 39 months, respectively. Considering patients completing chemotherapy and WAI, median disease-free and overall survivals were 24 and 46 months, respectively. Conclusions: (a) Disease progression occurred within three cycles of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in 40% of patients with optimal (≤1 cm residual) Stage III ovarian carcinoma. (b) Following limited chemotherapy, hyper-fractionated WAI was acutely well tolerated. (c) Late radiation-related toxicity was observed in only three patients (8.6%) in the absence of recurrent disease. Late gastrointestinal morbidity was significantly associated with the administration of a pelvic radiotherapy (RT) boost. (d) Short duration chemotherapy followed by SRA and hyperfractionated WAI without a pelvic boost is a promising management option for patients with optimal Stage III ovarian cancer. A Phase III trial will be necessary to determine how this treatment strategy compares with chemotherapy or RT alone in this patient population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)139-147
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Purpose: To determine outcomesa nd treatment toxicities in patients with optimal (11 cm residual) Stage man carcinoma treated with three courses of cisplatin-cyclophosphamide, surgical reassessment (SRA), and hyperfractionated whole abdominal irradiation (WAD Methods and Materials: Forty-two eligible patients entered this prospective Phase II study conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG). Diseasec haracteristics were as follows: age range, 32-76 years (median 58); Stage IIL4 (n = 1, 2%), IIIB (n = 2, 5%), IIIC (n = 39, 93%); histology-serousp apibary (n = 21,50%); other (n = 21,50%); Grade 1 (n = 1,2%); 2 (n = 14,33%); 3 (n = 27,54%); residual disease after initial surgery (present: n = 23, 55%; absent: II = 19, 45%). Five patients progressed while on chemotherapy, could not be effectively cytoreduced, and were not eligible for WAI. Of the remaining 37 patients, 35 received WAI. Surgical reassessmenwt as not performed in five patients. Results: Of 37 patients with known SRA status after chemotherapy, 21 (57%) were grossly positive, 4 (11%) were microscopically positive, and 12 (32%) were negative. Basedo n measurementsr ecorded foliow-ing initial laparotomy and surgical reassessmentp, rogression during chemotherapy was noted in 40%, stage diseasein 37%, and objective responsei n 23%. Toxicity during hyperfractionated WA1 was limited and reversible. No patient beginning WA1 failed to complete or required a significant treatment break. Following WAI, six patients underwent laparotomies for abdominai symptoms; five had recurrent disease. Five additional patients were managed conservatively for small bowel obstruction (SBO) or malabsorption, of whom three subsequentlyd eveloped recurrence. Twenty-two patients having pelvic boosts were signiti-cantly more likely to require management for gastrointestinal morbidity (p = 0.0021). Considering aii eligible patients, median disease-freea nd overall survivals were 18.5 and 39 months, respectiveiy. Considering patients completing chemotherapy and WAI, median disease-freea nd overall survivals were 24 and 46 months, respectively. Conclusions:( a) Diseasep rogressiono ccurred within three cycles of cisplatin and cyclophosphamidec bemo-therapy in 40% of patients with optimal (cl cm residual) Stage III ovarian carcinoma. (b) Following limited chemotherapy, hyper-fractionated WA1 was acutely well tolerated. (c) Late radiation-related toxicity Presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the American Society For Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, San Francisco, CA, 5 October 1994. Correspondence to: Marcus Randall, M.D., Indiana University Medical Center, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, 550 North University Blvd., Indianapolis, IN 46202. E-mail: [email protected] Reprint requests to: GOG Administrative Office, Suite 1945, 1234 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107. Acknowledgement-This study was supported by National Can- cer Institute grants of the Gynecologic Oncology Group Administrative Office (CA 27469) and the Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical Office (CA 37517). The following Gynecologic Oncology Group institutions participated in this study: Bowman Gray School of Medicine of Wake Forest University, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Rush-Presbyterian St. Luke’s Medical Center, Women’s Cancer Center and Cooper Hospital University Medical Center. Accepted for publication 19 May 1995.

Keywords

  • Abdominal radiotherapy
  • Combined modality therapy
  • Hyperfractionation
  • Ovarian cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiation
  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Chemotherapy, early surgical reassessment, and hyperfractionated abdominal radiotherapy in stage III ovarian cancer: Results of a gynecologic oncology group study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this