Clarification of Lenzenweger and Korfine (1992)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations


Lenzenweger (2003, this issue) objected to my suggestion that Lenzenweger and Korfine (1992) interpreted their taxometric study as support for Meehl's (1962, 1990) single major gene model of schizophrenia. I suggest in this brief response that my representation of Lenzenweger and Korfine was consistent with the statements they had made. However, I do welcome the clarification that there are alternative explanations for the manifest class taxon identified by Lenzenweger and Korfine (e.g., see Widiger, 2001) and I would encourage future taxometric studies to explore these alternatives.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)370-371
Number of pages2
JournalClinical Psychology: Science and Practice
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2003

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology


Dive into the research topics of 'Clarification of Lenzenweger and Korfine (1992)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this