Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clinical efficacy and safety of eravacycline for the treatment of enterococcal infections: a subpopulation analysis

  • Sean R.Van Helden
  • , Ashlan J.Kunz Coyne
  • , Sara Alosaimy
  • , Kyle C. Molina
  • , S. Lena Kang-Birken
  • , Justin Andrade
  • , Madeline A. King
  • , Kimberly C. Claeys
  • , Athena L.V. Hobbs
  • , Nicholson B. Perkins
  • , Jazmin Agee
  • , Alaina DeKerlegand
  • , Mark Biagi
  • , Michael P. Veve
  • , Serina Tart
  • , Tristan Gore
  • , Bruce M. Jones
  • , Benjamin M. Pullinger
  • , Melanie Rae Schrack
  • , Reese Cosimi
  • Shelbye R. Herbin, Chloe Judd, Mohammed Al Musawa, Michael J. Rybak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Infections due to Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium are common in the hospital setting and carry a high risk for morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, the incidence of drug-resistant phenotypes, such as vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) and daptomycin non-susceptible strains, is increasing. Eravacycline (ERV) is a novel tetracycline antibiotic approved for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections and possesses a broad spectrum of activity across both Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, including VRE, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. Methods: We conducted a subgroup analysis assessing the real-world efficacy and safety of ERV for the treatment of enterococcal infections. Adult patients who received ERV for ≥ 72 h for E. faecalis or E. faecium infections were included. The primary outcome of clinical cure was defined as resolution or improvement of infection-related signs and/or symptoms. Results: A total of 100 patients were included in the analysis. E. faecalis and E. faecium were present in 44% and 58% of patients, respectively, and 49% of all isolates were VRE. The most prevalent infection types were intra-abdominal, skin/soft tissue, and osteomyelitis, and a majority (80%) of infections were polymicrobial. Clinical cure was achieved in 77% of patients. Thirty-day mortality was 17% and 30-day infection-related mortality was 12%. Thirty-day hospital readmission rate was 14%, and microbiological recurrence occurred in 4% of patients. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 8% of patients, with 2% of patients requiring discontinuation of ERV. Conclusion: This study describes the real-world safety and efficacy of ERV for the treatment of enterococcal infections.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1754
JournalBMC Infectious Diseases
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.

Funding

This study was funded by an investigator-initiated grant from Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics, Inc.

Funders
Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Enterococcus
    • Enterococcus faecalis
    • Enterococcus faecium
    • Eravacycline
    • Tetracycline
    • VRE
    • Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Infectious Diseases

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical efficacy and safety of eravacycline for the treatment of enterococcal infections: a subpopulation analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this