TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinician Perspectives on Challenges to Patient Centered Care at the End of Life
AU - Bardach, Shoshana H.
AU - Dunn, Edward J.
AU - Stein, J. Christopher
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2015.
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - Discussions regarding patient preferences for resuscitation are often delayed and preferences may be neglected, leading to the receipt of unwanted medical care. To better understand barriers to the expression and realization of patients' end of life wishes, a preventive ethics team in one Veterans Affairs Medical Center conducted a survey of physicians, nurses, social workers, and respiratory therapists. Surveys were analyzed through qualitative analysis, using sorting methodologies to identify themes. Analysis revealed barriers to patient wishes being identified and followed, including discomfort conducting end-of-life discussions, difficulty locating patients' preferences in medical records, challenges with expiring do not resuscitate (DNR) orders, and confusion over terminology. Based on these findings, the preventive ethics team proposed new terminology for code status preferences, elimination of the local policy for expiration of DNR orders, and enhanced systems for storing and retrieving patients' end-of-life preferences. Educational efforts were initiated to facilitate implementation of the proposed changes.
AB - Discussions regarding patient preferences for resuscitation are often delayed and preferences may be neglected, leading to the receipt of unwanted medical care. To better understand barriers to the expression and realization of patients' end of life wishes, a preventive ethics team in one Veterans Affairs Medical Center conducted a survey of physicians, nurses, social workers, and respiratory therapists. Surveys were analyzed through qualitative analysis, using sorting methodologies to identify themes. Analysis revealed barriers to patient wishes being identified and followed, including discomfort conducting end-of-life discussions, difficulty locating patients' preferences in medical records, challenges with expiring do not resuscitate (DNR) orders, and confusion over terminology. Based on these findings, the preventive ethics team proposed new terminology for code status preferences, elimination of the local policy for expiration of DNR orders, and enhanced systems for storing and retrieving patients' end-of-life preferences. Educational efforts were initiated to facilitate implementation of the proposed changes.
KW - end of life
KW - ethics
KW - patient care planning
KW - qualitative research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014483444&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014483444&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0733464815584668
DO - 10.1177/0733464815584668
M3 - Review article
C2 - 25956446
AN - SCOPUS:85014483444
SN - 0733-4648
VL - 36
SP - 401
EP - 415
JO - Journal of Applied Gerontology
JF - Journal of Applied Gerontology
IS - 4
ER -