TY - JOUR
T1 - Coaching Practitioners and Families to Provide Academic Instruction to Young Children
T2 - A Systematic Review of Single Case Experimental Studies
AU - Hardy, Jessica K.
AU - McCorkle, Laura S.
AU - Pennington, Robert C.
AU - Williams, Thai
AU - Duncan, Amanda L.
AU - Kim, Casey K.H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Early academic skills predict later achievement, yet many caregivers and teachers feel unprepared to teach academics to young children. Coaching may be effective at supporting these adults to provide academic instruction. In this systematic literature review, we identified eight single case design (SCD) studies in which coaching was used to support the use of academic instruction with children aged 2–5 years. We coded studies using a researcher-developed coding scheme and the Single Case Analysis and Review Framework (SCARF). We found many authors did not report critical components of the intervention and variability in the number of quality indicators present and strength of outcomes. Thus, there is insufficient evidence from the SCD literature to support that coaching practitioners and caregivers to provide academic instruction in early childhood settings is an evidence-based practice. Implications include the need for more research on coaching in academic instruction in early childhood, as well as a need for more stringent reporting of coach, coachee, and intervention characteristics.
AB - Early academic skills predict later achievement, yet many caregivers and teachers feel unprepared to teach academics to young children. Coaching may be effective at supporting these adults to provide academic instruction. In this systematic literature review, we identified eight single case design (SCD) studies in which coaching was used to support the use of academic instruction with children aged 2–5 years. We coded studies using a researcher-developed coding scheme and the Single Case Analysis and Review Framework (SCARF). We found many authors did not report critical components of the intervention and variability in the number of quality indicators present and strength of outcomes. Thus, there is insufficient evidence from the SCD literature to support that coaching practitioners and caregivers to provide academic instruction in early childhood settings is an evidence-based practice. Implications include the need for more research on coaching in academic instruction in early childhood, as well as a need for more stringent reporting of coach, coachee, and intervention characteristics.
KW - Coaching
KW - Early childhood special education
KW - Early intervention
KW - Professional development
KW - Review
KW - Single case methodology
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105022311821
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105022311821&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10643-025-02047-x
DO - 10.1007/s10643-025-02047-x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105022311821
SN - 1082-3301
JO - Early Childhood Education Journal
JF - Early Childhood Education Journal
ER -