TY - JOUR
T1 - Collected world experience about the performance of the snorkel/chimney endovascular technique in the treatment of complex aortic pathologies
T2 - The PERICLES registry
AU - Donas, Konstantinos P.
AU - Lee, Jason T.
AU - Lachat, Mario
AU - Torsello, Giovanni
AU - Veith, Frank J.
AU - Dalman, Ronald L.
AU - Tran, Kenneth
AU - Pecoraro, Felice
AU - Bisdas, Theodosios
AU - Seifert, Sven
AU - Esche, Mirko
AU - Gasparini, Daniele
AU - Frigatti, Paolo
AU - Adovasio, Roberto
AU - Mucelli, Fabio Pozzi
AU - Damrauer, Scott M.
AU - Woo, Edward Y.
AU - Beck, Adam
AU - Scali, Salvatore
AU - Minion, David
AU - Salenius, Juha
AU - Suominen, Velipekka
AU - Mangialardi, Nicola
AU - Ronchey, Sonia
AU - Fazzini, Stefano
AU - Mestres, Gaspar
AU - Riambau, Vincent
AU - Mosquera, Nilo J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/9/1
Y1 - 2015/9/1
N2 - Objectives: We sought to analyze the collected worldwide experience with use of snorkel/chimney endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for complex abdominal aneurysm treatment. Background: EVAR has largely replaced open surgery worldwide for anatomically suitable aortic aneurysms. Lack of availability of fenestrated and branched devices has encouraged an alternative strategy utilizing parallel or snorkel/chimney grafts (ch-EVAR). Methods: Clinical and radiographic information was retrospectively reviewed and analyzed on 517 patients treated by ch-EVAR from 2008 from 2014 by prearranged defined and documented protocols. Results: A total of 119 patients in US centers and 398 in European centers were treated during the study period. US centers preferentially used Zenith stent-grafts (54.2%) and European centers Endurant stent-grafts (62.2%) for the main body component. Overall 898 chimney grafts (49.2% balloon expandable, 39.6% self-expanding covered stents, and 11.2% balloon expandable bare metal stents) were placed in 692 renal arteries, 156 superior mesenteric arteries (SMA), and 50 celiac arteries. At a mean follow-up of 17.1 months (range: 1-70 months), primary patency was 94%, with secondary patency of 95.3%. Overall survival of patients in this high-risk cohort for open repair at latest follow-up was 79%. Conclusions: This global experience represents the largest series in the ch-EVAR literature and demonstrates comparable outcomes to those in published reports of branched/fenestrated devices, suggesting the appropriateness of broader applicability and the need for continued careful surveillance. These results support ch-EVAR as a valid off-the-shelf and immediately available alternative in the treatment of complex abdominal EVAR and provide impetus for the standardization of these techniques in the future.
AB - Objectives: We sought to analyze the collected worldwide experience with use of snorkel/chimney endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for complex abdominal aneurysm treatment. Background: EVAR has largely replaced open surgery worldwide for anatomically suitable aortic aneurysms. Lack of availability of fenestrated and branched devices has encouraged an alternative strategy utilizing parallel or snorkel/chimney grafts (ch-EVAR). Methods: Clinical and radiographic information was retrospectively reviewed and analyzed on 517 patients treated by ch-EVAR from 2008 from 2014 by prearranged defined and documented protocols. Results: A total of 119 patients in US centers and 398 in European centers were treated during the study period. US centers preferentially used Zenith stent-grafts (54.2%) and European centers Endurant stent-grafts (62.2%) for the main body component. Overall 898 chimney grafts (49.2% balloon expandable, 39.6% self-expanding covered stents, and 11.2% balloon expandable bare metal stents) were placed in 692 renal arteries, 156 superior mesenteric arteries (SMA), and 50 celiac arteries. At a mean follow-up of 17.1 months (range: 1-70 months), primary patency was 94%, with secondary patency of 95.3%. Overall survival of patients in this high-risk cohort for open repair at latest follow-up was 79%. Conclusions: This global experience represents the largest series in the ch-EVAR literature and demonstrates comparable outcomes to those in published reports of branched/fenestrated devices, suggesting the appropriateness of broader applicability and the need for continued careful surveillance. These results support ch-EVAR as a valid off-the-shelf and immediately available alternative in the treatment of complex abdominal EVAR and provide impetus for the standardization of these techniques in the future.
KW - Abdominal aortic aneurysm
KW - Endovascular
KW - Fenestrated
KW - Thoracoabdominal
KW - Vascular
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942546426&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942546426&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001405
DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001405
M3 - Article
C2 - 26258324
AN - SCOPUS:84942546426
SN - 0003-4932
VL - 262
SP - 546
EP - 552
JO - Annals of Surgery
JF - Annals of Surgery
IS - 3
ER -