TY - JOUR
T1 - Colorectal cancer prevention
T2 - Perspectives of key players from social networks in a low-income rural US region
AU - Schoenberg, Nancy E.
AU - Eddens, Kathryn
AU - Jonas, Adam
AU - Snell-Rood, Claire
AU - Studts, Christina R.
AU - Broder-Oldach, Benjamin
AU - Katz, Mira L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 N. E. Schoenberg et al.
PY - 2016/2/22
Y1 - 2016/2/22
N2 - Social networks influence health behavior and health status. Within social networks, "key players" often influence those around them, particularly in traditionally underserved areas like the Appalachian region in the USA. From a total sample of 787 Appalachian residents, we identified and interviewed 10 key players in complex networks, asking them what comprises a key player, their role in their network and community, and ideas to overcome and increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Key players emphasized their communication skills, resourcefulness, and special occupational and educational status in the community. Barriers to CRC screening included negative perceptions of the colonoscopy screening procedure, discomfort with the medical system, and misinformed perspectives on screening. Ideas to improve screening focused on increasing awareness of women's susceptibility to CRC, providing information on different screening tests, improving access, and the key role of health-care providers and key players themselves. We provide recommendations to leverage these vital community resources.
AB - Social networks influence health behavior and health status. Within social networks, "key players" often influence those around them, particularly in traditionally underserved areas like the Appalachian region in the USA. From a total sample of 787 Appalachian residents, we identified and interviewed 10 key players in complex networks, asking them what comprises a key player, their role in their network and community, and ideas to overcome and increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Key players emphasized their communication skills, resourcefulness, and special occupational and educational status in the community. Barriers to CRC screening included negative perceptions of the colonoscopy screening procedure, discomfort with the medical system, and misinformed perspectives on screening. Ideas to improve screening focused on increasing awareness of women's susceptibility to CRC, providing information on different screening tests, improving access, and the key role of health-care providers and key players themselves. We provide recommendations to leverage these vital community resources.
KW - Cancer screening
KW - Colorectal cancer
KW - Health inequities
KW - Qualitative
KW - Rural
KW - Social networks
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962241202&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962241202&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3402/qhw.v11.30396
DO - 10.3402/qhw.v11.30396
M3 - Article
C2 - 26905402
AN - SCOPUS:84962241202
SN - 1748-2623
VL - 11
JO - International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being
JF - International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being
M1 - 30396
ER -