Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparing Process Tracing Paradigms: Tracking Attention via Mouse and Eye Movements

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

This chapter focuses on two often implemented methodologies for capturing attention in decision making via recording mouse movements and eye movements. A key difference between paradigms that use mouse and eye movements is that the former has a tendency to induce systematicity in the search process. Earlier work comparing eye and mouse movements demonstrated that as the task complexity increased based on number of attributes and alternatives, differences emerged in terms of processing time and reacquisitions. In relation to attention theories, eye movements provide a distinct advantage over mouse movement in terms of measuring attention, assumed by relating overt and covert attention. Mouse movements have provided an initial step towards capturing and understanding the deliberation process and acquisition of information in decision making. The disadvantages associated with tracing mouse movements are perhaps best explained by analyzing the benefits of eye-tracking technologies.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationA Handbook of Process Tracing Methods
Subtitle of host publicationSecond Edition
Pages96-110
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9781351662765
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 selection and editorial matter, Michael Schulte- Mecklenbeck, Anton Kühberger, and Joseph G. Johnson; individual chapters, the contributors.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
  • General Business, Management and Accounting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing Process Tracing Paradigms: Tracking Attention via Mouse and Eye Movements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this