Comparison between Listeria sensu stricto and Listeria sensu lato strains identifies novel determinants involved in infection

Jakob Schardt, Grant Jones, Stefanie Müller-Herbst, Kristina Schauer, Sarah E.F. D'Orazio, Thilo M. Fuchs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

The human pathogen L. monocytogenes and the animal pathogen L. ivanovii, together with four other species isolated from symptom-free animals, form the "Listeria sensu stricto" clade. The members of the second clade, "Listeria sensu lato", are believed to be solely environmental bacteria without the ability to colonize mammalian hosts. To identify novel determinants that contribute to infection by L. monocytogenes, the causative agent of the foodborne disease listeriosis, we performed a genome comparison of the two clades and found 151 candidate genes that are conserved in the Listeria sensu stricto species. Two factors were investigated further in vitro and in vivo. A mutant lacking an ATP-binding cassette transporter exhibited defective adhesion and invasion of human Caco-2 cells. Using a mouse model of foodborne L. monocytogenes infection, a reduced number of the mutant strain compared to the parental strain was observed in the small intestine and the liver. Another mutant with a defective 1,2-propanediol degradation pathway showed reduced persistence in the stool of infected mice, suggesting a role of 1,2-propanediol as a carbon and energy source of listeriae during infection. These findings reveal the relevance of novel factors for the colonization process of L. monocytogenes.

Original languageEnglish
Article number17821
JournalScientific Reports
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Author(s).

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison between Listeria sensu stricto and Listeria sensu lato strains identifies novel determinants involved in infection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this