Comparison of algorithms for matrix inversion with multi-quarks

He Ping Ying; Shao Jing Dong; Keh Fei Liu

doi:10.1016/s0920-5632(96)00837-7

Comparison of algorithms for matrix inversion with multi-quarks

He Ping Ying
, Shao Jing Dong
, Keh Fei Liu

Physics And Astronomy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

We test iterative algorithms, MR, QMR_γ5 and BiCG_γ5, to compare their efficiency in matrix inversion with multi-quarks (shifted matrices) within one iteration process. Our results on the 8³ × 12 and 16³ x 24 show that MR admits multi-quark calculation with less memory requirement, whereas QMR is faster for the single quark calculation.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	993-996
Number of pages	4
Journal	Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements
Volume	53
Issue number	1-3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/s0920-5632(96)00837-7
State	Published - Feb 1997

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Access to Document

10.1016/s0920-5632(96)00837-7

Cite this

@article{7cd0f7ba45424f0699eccfa61aeed9d8,

title = "Comparison of algorithms for matrix inversion with multi-quarks",

abstract = "We test iterative algorithms, MR, QMRγ5 and BiCGγ5, to compare their efficiency in matrix inversion with multi-quarks (shifted matrices) within one iteration process. Our results on the 83 × 12 and 163 x 24 show that MR admits multi-quark calculation with less memory requirement, whereas QMR is faster for the single quark calculation.",

author = "Ying, \{He Ping\} and Dong, \{Shao Jing\} and Liu, \{Keh Fei\}",

year = "1997",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1016/s0920-5632(96)00837-7",

language = "English",

volume = "53",

pages = "993--996",

number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of algorithms for matrix inversion with multi-quarks

AU - Ying, He Ping

AU - Dong, Shao Jing

AU - Liu, Keh Fei

PY - 1997/2

Y1 - 1997/2

N2 - We test iterative algorithms, MR, QMRγ5 and BiCGγ5, to compare their efficiency in matrix inversion with multi-quarks (shifted matrices) within one iteration process. Our results on the 83 × 12 and 163 x 24 show that MR admits multi-quark calculation with less memory requirement, whereas QMR is faster for the single quark calculation.

AB - We test iterative algorithms, MR, QMRγ5 and BiCGγ5, to compare their efficiency in matrix inversion with multi-quarks (shifted matrices) within one iteration process. Our results on the 83 × 12 and 163 x 24 show that MR admits multi-quark calculation with less memory requirement, whereas QMR is faster for the single quark calculation.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0031068394

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0031068394#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1016/s0920-5632(96)00837-7

DO - 10.1016/s0920-5632(96)00837-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0031068394

SN - 0920-5632

VL - 53

SP - 993

EP - 996

JO - Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements

JF - Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements

IS - 1-3

ER -

Comparison of algorithms for matrix inversion with multi-quarks

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this