Abstract
Three commonly used numerical schemes for condensational growth of aerosols are compared with analytical solutions. The sectional method is interpreted in light of the upwind differencing and the Smolarkiewicz method. Case studies for fast and slow condensation processes are used to demonstrate the performance of various numerical schemes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 271-277 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Aerosol Science and Technology |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1988 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (CBT-8504377 and the Kentucky EPSCoR Program). Those who are interested in using CONFEMM, please contact T. H. Tsang.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (CBT-8504377 and the Kentucky EPSCoR Program). Those who are interested in using CONFEMM, please contact T. H. Tsang.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Kentucky Statewide EPSCoR | |
| National Science Foundation (NSF) | CBT-8504377 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Chemistry
- General Materials Science
- Pollution
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of different numerical schemes for condensational growth of aerosols'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver