Comparison of parent versus child-report of child impulsivity traits and prediction of outcome variables

Tamika C.B. Zapolski, Gregory T. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

Five personality traits that dispose individuals to rash or ill-advised action (i.e., sensation seeking, negative urgency, positive urgency, lack of planning, and lack of perseverance), can be reliably and validly assessed in children. This paper reports on the first test of parental reports of these traits. In a sample of 94 children (ages 7-13, mean age 10.6), the authors found the following. First, parental reports of the five traits in their children appeared to be reliable. Second, there was moderate convergent validity: parent and child reports of the same traits had a median correlation of r =.30. Third, there was adequate discriminant validity: within-parent reports on different traits had a median correlation of r =.11. Fourth, concurrent prediction of child behavior from parental reports generally was inconsistent with prior findings. Fifth, discrepancies between the two reporters did predict dysfunctional child behavior. There are advantages to securing both child self-report and parental report of personality dispositions to rash action, although there is limited evidence for the concurrent validity of parental reports.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)301-313
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Keywords

  • Children
  • Impulsivity
  • Parent
  • Personality
  • Risky behavior
  • Traits

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of parent versus child-report of child impulsivity traits and prediction of outcome variables'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this