TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of sibrafiban with aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular events after acute coronary syndromes
T2 - A randomised trial
AU - Diaz, R.
AU - Paolasso, E.
AU - Klein, W.
AU - Piegas, L.
AU - Halinen, M.
AU - Dimas, A. P.
AU - Preda, I.
AU - Ardissino, D.
AU - Madsen, S.
AU - Sugrue, D.
AU - Gibler, W. B.
AU - Granger, C. B.
AU - Harrington, R. A.
AU - Holmes, D. R.
AU - Ohman, E. M.
AU - Califf, R.
AU - Zillman, L.
AU - Lee, K.
AU - Lemons, P.
AU - McCourt, B.
AU - Campbell, C.
AU - Tardiff, B.
AU - Snapp, J.
AU - Bassett, K.
AU - Hodgson, P.
AU - Hannan, K.
AU - Kandzari, L.
AU - Hawkins, S.
AU - Hinman-Smith, E.
AU - McDougal, M.
AU - Raffetto, K.
AU - Thompson, D.
AU - Wehrle, T.
AU - Ange, C.
AU - Brown, R.
AU - Grissom, G.
AU - Heuckel, M.
AU - McCall, J.
AU - Pennachi, W.
AU - Spychala, M.
AU - Veasey, S.
AU - Pullium, M.
AU - Journey, T.
AU - Quintero, K.
AU - Mark, D.
AU - Davidson-Ray, L.
AU - Diner, L.
AU - Nelson, C.
AU - Moliterno, D.
AU - Gurley, J.
PY - 2000/1/29
Y1 - 2000/1/29
N2 - Background: Aspirin lowers risks of death and myocardial infarction in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists further reduce the rates of ischaemic events in these patients, but the efficacy of long-term oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade has not been established. We tested whether the oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist sibrafiban would prevent more cardiovascular events than aspirin, when given within 7 days of, and sustained for 90 days after, an acute coronary syndrome event. Methods: 9233 patients who had stabilised after an acute coronary syndrome event were randomly assigned aspirin (80 mg orally twice daily) or low-dose or high-dose sibrafiban. Sibrafiban doses (3.0 mg, 4.5 mg, or 6.0 mg) were based on a model accounting for weight and serum creatinine and designed to achieve at least 25% steady-state inhibition of platelet aggregation (low dose) or at least 50% inhibition (high dose). The primary endpoint was the composite of death, non-fatal infarction or reinfarction, or severe recurrent ischaemia at 90 days. Analysis was by intention to treat. Findings: The 90-day rate of the primary endpoint did not differ significantly between the groups assigned aspirin (302 [9.8%]), low-dose sibrafiban (310 [10.1%]; odds ratio 1.03 [95% Cl 0.87-1.21]), and high-dose sibrafiban (303 [10.1%]; 1.03 [0.87-1.21]). The groups did not differ significantly in the rates of the component events or secondary efficacy endpoints. Major bleeding was more common with high-dose sibrafiban (171 [5.7%]) than with aspirin (120 [3.9%]) or low-dose sibrafiban (159 [5.2%]). Interpretation: Sibrafiban showed no additional benefit over aspirin for secondary prevention of major ischaemic events after an acute coronary syndrome, and was associated with more dose-related bleeding.
AB - Background: Aspirin lowers risks of death and myocardial infarction in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists further reduce the rates of ischaemic events in these patients, but the efficacy of long-term oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade has not been established. We tested whether the oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist sibrafiban would prevent more cardiovascular events than aspirin, when given within 7 days of, and sustained for 90 days after, an acute coronary syndrome event. Methods: 9233 patients who had stabilised after an acute coronary syndrome event were randomly assigned aspirin (80 mg orally twice daily) or low-dose or high-dose sibrafiban. Sibrafiban doses (3.0 mg, 4.5 mg, or 6.0 mg) were based on a model accounting for weight and serum creatinine and designed to achieve at least 25% steady-state inhibition of platelet aggregation (low dose) or at least 50% inhibition (high dose). The primary endpoint was the composite of death, non-fatal infarction or reinfarction, or severe recurrent ischaemia at 90 days. Analysis was by intention to treat. Findings: The 90-day rate of the primary endpoint did not differ significantly between the groups assigned aspirin (302 [9.8%]), low-dose sibrafiban (310 [10.1%]; odds ratio 1.03 [95% Cl 0.87-1.21]), and high-dose sibrafiban (303 [10.1%]; 1.03 [0.87-1.21]). The groups did not differ significantly in the rates of the component events or secondary efficacy endpoints. Major bleeding was more common with high-dose sibrafiban (171 [5.7%]) than with aspirin (120 [3.9%]) or low-dose sibrafiban (159 [5.2%]). Interpretation: Sibrafiban showed no additional benefit over aspirin for secondary prevention of major ischaemic events after an acute coronary syndrome, and was associated with more dose-related bleeding.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034728088&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034728088&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)11179-6
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)11179-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 10665552
AN - SCOPUS:0034728088
SN - 0140-6736
VL - 355
SP - 337
EP - 345
JO - The Lancet
JF - The Lancet
IS - 9201
ER -