TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix vs. Free Gingival Grafts to Increase the Zone of Keratinized Mucosa Around Functioning Implants
AU - Vellis, Jimmy
AU - Kutkut, Ahmad
AU - Al-Sabbagh, Mohanad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2019/2/1
Y1 - 2019/2/1
N2 - Purpose:To evaluate the effectiveness of collagen matrix (CM) grafts as an alternative to free gingival grafts (FGGs) in increasing the zone of keratinized tissue (KT) around dental implants.Methods:Thirty subjects with 2 contralateral implants were recruited. The test group (n = 30) received CM grafts. The control group (n = 30) received FGGs. Clinical variables were plaque index, gingival index, probing depths, bleeding on probing (BOP), and mucosal recession (MR). Subjects were followed at 1 and 2 weeks and 1, 3, and 6 months.Results:FGGs resulted in mean gains (3.73 ± 1.93 mm) in KT for 28 of 30 implants (93% success rate). CM grafts resulted in mean gains (3.23 ± 1.52 mm) in KT for 29 of the 30 implants (97% success rate). Mean change in pocket depth around implants grafted with FGG was-0.24 ± 1.02 mm and with CM was-0.25 ± 0.80 mm. Mean change in BOP around implants grafted with FGG was 0.03 ± 0.49 and with CM was 0.13 ± 0.57.Conclusion:CM grafts achieved results comparable to those of FGGs in augmented tissue. They do not negatively affect probing depths, MR, or bleeding on probing.
AB - Purpose:To evaluate the effectiveness of collagen matrix (CM) grafts as an alternative to free gingival grafts (FGGs) in increasing the zone of keratinized tissue (KT) around dental implants.Methods:Thirty subjects with 2 contralateral implants were recruited. The test group (n = 30) received CM grafts. The control group (n = 30) received FGGs. Clinical variables were plaque index, gingival index, probing depths, bleeding on probing (BOP), and mucosal recession (MR). Subjects were followed at 1 and 2 weeks and 1, 3, and 6 months.Results:FGGs resulted in mean gains (3.73 ± 1.93 mm) in KT for 28 of 30 implants (93% success rate). CM grafts resulted in mean gains (3.23 ± 1.52 mm) in KT for 29 of the 30 implants (97% success rate). Mean change in pocket depth around implants grafted with FGG was-0.24 ± 1.02 mm and with CM was-0.25 ± 0.80 mm. Mean change in BOP around implants grafted with FGG was 0.03 ± 0.49 and with CM was 0.13 ± 0.57.Conclusion:CM grafts achieved results comparable to those of FGGs in augmented tissue. They do not negatively affect probing depths, MR, or bleeding on probing.
KW - Gingiva
KW - autologous
KW - implant
KW - keratin
KW - transplantation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060542990&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060542990&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/ID.0000000000000842
DO - 10.1097/ID.0000000000000842
M3 - Article
C2 - 30461439
AN - SCOPUS:85060542990
SN - 1056-6163
VL - 28
SP - 20
EP - 27
JO - Implant Dentistry
JF - Implant Dentistry
IS - 1
ER -