Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Complementary clinical benefits of coronary-artery stenting and blockade of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors

  • A. Michael Lincoff
  • , Robert M. Califf
  • , David J. Moliterno
  • , Stephen G. Ellis
  • , John Ducas
  • , Jeffrey H. Kramer
  • , Neal S. Kleiman
  • , Eric A. Cohen
  • , Joan E. Booth
  • , Shelly K. Sapp
  • , Catherine F. Cabot
  • , Eric J. Topol
  • , James E. Tcheng
  • , J. David Talley
  • , Paul O. Caramori
  • , Jeffrey R. Burton
  • , Thomas A. Kelly
  • , Tom B. Ivanc

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

396 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Inhibition of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor with the monoclonal-antibody fragment abciximab reduces the acute ischemic complications associated with percutaneous coronary revascularization, whereas coronary-stent implantation reduces restenosis. We conducted a trial to determine the efficacy of abciximab and stent implantation in improving long-term outcome. Methods: A total of 2399 patients were randomly assigned to stent implantation and placebo, stent implantation and abciximab, or balloon angioplasty and abciximab. The patients were followed for six months. Results: At six months, the incidence of the composite end point of death or myocardial infarction was 11.4 percent in the group that received a stent and placebo, as compared with 5.6 percent in the group that received a stent and abciximab (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.33 to 0.68; P<0.001) and 7.8 percent in the group assigned to balloon angioplasty and abciximab (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.49 to 0.92; P=0.01). The hazard ratio for stenting plus abciximab as compared with angioplasty plus abciximab was 0.70 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.48 to 1.04; P=0.07). The rate of repeated revascularization of the target vessel was 10.6 percent in the stent-plus-placebo group, as compared with 8.7 percent in the stent-plus-abciximab group (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 1.13; P=0.22) and 15.4 percent in the angioplasty-plus-abciximab group (hazard ratio, 1,49; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.97; P=0.005). The hazard ratio for stenting plus abciximab as compared with angioplasty plus abciximab was 0.55 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.74; P<0.001). Among patients with diabetes, the combination of abciximab and stenting was associated with a lower rate of repeated target-vessel revascularization (8.1 percent) than was stenting and placebo (16.6 percent, P=0.02) or angioplasty and abciximab (18.4 percent, P=0.008). Conclusions: For coronary revascularization, abciximab and stent implantation confer complementary long-term clinical benefits.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)319-327
Number of pages9
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume341
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 29 1999

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Complementary clinical benefits of coronary-artery stenting and blockade of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this