Abstract
This paper investigates the comparative design optimizations of a five-phase outer-rotor flux-switching permanent magnet (FSPM) machine for in-wheel traction applications. To improve the comprehensive performance of the motor, two kinds of large-scale design optimizations under different operating conditions are performed and compared, including the traditional optimization performed at the rated operating point and the optimization targeting the whole driving cycles. Three driving cycles are taken into account, namely, the urban dynamometer driving schedule (UDDS), the highway fuel economy driving schedule (HWFET), and the combined UDDS/HWFET, representing the city, highway, and combined city/highway driving, respectively. Meanwhile, the computationally efficient finite-element analysis (CE-FEA) method, the cyclic representative operating points extraction technique, as well as the response surface methodology (in order to minimize the number of experiments when establishing the inverse machine model), are presented to reduce the computational effort and cost. From the results and discussion, it will be found that the optimization results against different operating conditions exhibit distinct characteristics in terms of geometry, efficiency, and energy loss distributions. For the traditional optimization performed at the rated operating point, the optimal design tends to reduce copper losses but suffer from high core losses; for UDDS, the optimal design tends to minimize both copper losses and PM eddy-current losses in the low-speed region; for HWFET, the optimal design tends to minimize core losses in the high-speed region; for the combined UDDS/HWFET, the optimal design tends to balance/compromise the loss components in both the low-speed and high-speed regions. Furthermore, the advantages of the adopted optimization methodologies versus the traditional procedure are highlighted.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 8708683 |
Pages (from-to) | 6495-6508 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology |
Volume | 68 |
Issue number | 7 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019 IEEE.
Funding
Manuscript received November 28, 2018; revised March 15, 2019; accepted April 27, 2019. Date of publication May 7, 2019; date of current version July 16, 2019. This work was supported in part by the Intelligent Equipment and Technology of Automation Research and Development Platform under Grant 2016F2FC007 and in part by the China scholarship Council. The review of this paper was coordinated by Prof. J. Ye. (Corresponding author: Zhen Chen.) H. Chen is with the School of Automation, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 10081, China, and also with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53233 USA (e-mail: [email protected]).
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Intelligent Equipment and Technology of Automation Research and Development Platform | 2016F2FC007 |
China Scholarship Council |
Keywords
- Design optimization
- driving cycle
- flux-switching
- permanent-magnet (PM) machine
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Aerospace Engineering
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Computer Networks and Communications
- Automotive Engineering