TY - JOUR
T1 - Condyle position as a predictor of temporomandibular joint internal derangement.
AU - Bonilla-Aragon, H.
AU - Tallents, R. H.
AU - Katzberg, R. W.
AU - Kyrkanides, S.
AU - Moss, M. E.
PY - 1999/8
Y1 - 1999/8
N2 - STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The significance of the position of the mandibular condyle in the glenoid fossa remains a controversial subject. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the relationship between condyle position and disk displacement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-two asymptomatic volunteers and 130 symptomatic patients underwent linear tomography and bilateral temporomandibular joint magnetic resonance scans. RESULTS: There was a higher prevalence of distal condyles in symptomatic patients with disk displacement compared with asymptomatic volunteers (P <.05). Distally positioned condyles identified joints with disk displacement with reduction, disk displacement without reduction, or a symptomatic normal joint with a sensitivity of 0.64, 0.56, and 0.33, respectively. Distally positioned condyles identified joints with disk displacement with reduction, disk displacement without reduction, or a symptomatic normal joint with a specificity of 0.56, 0.65, and 0.55, respectively. CONCLUSION: There were more distal condyles in symptomatic subjects with disk displacement, but the reliability of a distal condyle to predict the presence or absence of disk displacement was low.
AB - STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The significance of the position of the mandibular condyle in the glenoid fossa remains a controversial subject. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the relationship between condyle position and disk displacement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-two asymptomatic volunteers and 130 symptomatic patients underwent linear tomography and bilateral temporomandibular joint magnetic resonance scans. RESULTS: There was a higher prevalence of distal condyles in symptomatic patients with disk displacement compared with asymptomatic volunteers (P <.05). Distally positioned condyles identified joints with disk displacement with reduction, disk displacement without reduction, or a symptomatic normal joint with a sensitivity of 0.64, 0.56, and 0.33, respectively. Distally positioned condyles identified joints with disk displacement with reduction, disk displacement without reduction, or a symptomatic normal joint with a specificity of 0.56, 0.65, and 0.55, respectively. CONCLUSION: There were more distal condyles in symptomatic subjects with disk displacement, but the reliability of a distal condyle to predict the presence or absence of disk displacement was low.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033172701&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033172701&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70157-5
DO - 10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70157-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 10424985
AN - SCOPUS:0033172701
SN - 0022-3913
VL - 82
SP - 205
EP - 208
JO - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
JF - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
IS - 2
ER -