Loss and fragmentation of natural habitats caused by human land uses have subdivided several formerly contiguous large carnivore populations into multiple small and often isolated subpopulations, which can reduce genetic variation and lead to precipitous population declines. Substantial habitat loss and fragmentation from urban development and agriculture expansion relegated the Highlands-Glades subpopulation (HGS) of Florida, USA, black bears (Ursus americanus floridanus) to prolonged isolation; increasing human land development is projected to cause ≥ 50% loss of remaining natural habitats occupied by the HGS in coming decades. We conducted a noninvasive genetic spatial capture-recapture study to quantitatively describe the degree of contemporary habitat fragmentation and investigate the consequences of habitat fragmentation on population density and genetics of the HGS. Remaining natural habitats sustaining the HGS were significantly more fragmented and patchier than those supporting Florida’s largest black bear subpopulation. Genetic diversity was low (AR = 3.57; HE = 0.49) and effective population size was small (NE = 25 bears), both of which remained unchanged over a period spanning one bear generation despite evidence of some immigration. Subpopulation density (0.054 bear/km2) was among the lowest reported for black bears, was significantly female-biased, and corresponded to a subpopulation size of 98 bears in available habitat. Conserving remaining natural habitats in the area occupied by the small, genetically depauperate HGS, possibly through conservation easements and government land acquisition, is likely the most important immediate step to ensuring continued persistence of bears in this area. Our study also provides evidence that preferentially placing detectors (e.g., hair traps or cameras) primarily in quality habitat across fragmented landscapes poses a challenge to estimating density-habitat covariate relationships using spatial capture-recapture models. Because habitat fragmentation and loss are likely to increase in severity globally, further investigation of the influence of habitat fragmentation and detector placement on estimation of this relationship is warranted.
|State||Published - Jul 2017|
Bibliographical noteFunding Information:
Disney Wordwide Conservation Fund provided funding for this study to JJC (grant #5-37629; URL: https://thewaltdisneycompany.com/ environment/#disney-conservation-fund), but had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission provided support for this study, but the funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Fish and Wildlife Foundation of Florida provided funding for this study to JJC (grant #CWT 1011-02, CWT 1112-02, CWT 1213-01; URL: http://www.fishwildlifeflorida. org/), but had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. University of Kentucky, Department of Forestry provided funding for this study to JJC (internal funds, no grant; URL: http://forestry.ca.uky.edu/), but had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Archbold Biological Station provided support for this study, but the funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We thank Disney Worldwide Conservation Fund, Fish and Wildlife Foundation of Florida, Department of Forestry at University of Kentucky, and Archbold Biological Station for support of our research. We thank M. Gandolfi, J. Styga, S. Kennedy, and J. Gehring for their assistance with constructing and monitoring hair traps. We are grateful for the expedient laboratory analyses by staff at Wildlife Genetics International. We very much appreciate the support from the numerous private landowners in Highlands and Glades counties, Florida; access to their lands ensured the success of this study. We thank the Academic Editor and 2 anonymous referees for providing helpful reviews of manuscript drafts. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our respective institutions. Use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by University of Kentucky, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, or Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.
© 2017 Murphy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)