TY - JOUR
T1 - Coronally positioned flap plus resin-modified glass ionomer restoration for the treatment of gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesions
T2 - A randomized controlled clinical trial
AU - Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine
AU - Suaid, Fabricia Ferreira
AU - Casati, Marcio Zaffalon
AU - Nociti, Francisco Humberto
AU - Sallum, Antonio Wilson
AU - Sallum, Enilson Antônio
PY - 2008/4
Y1 - 2008/4
N2 - Background: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the treatment of gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesions by a coronally advanced flap alone (CAF) or in combination with a resin-modified glass ionomer restoration (CAF+R). Methods: Nineteen subjects with bilateral Miller Class I buccal gingival recessions associated with non-carious cervical lesions were selected. The recessions were assigned randomly to receive CAF or CAF+R. Bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), relative gingival recession (RGR), clinical attachment level (CAL), non-carious cervical lesion height (CLH), and dentin sensitivity (DS) were measured at baseline; 45 days; and 2, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Keratinized tissue width (KTW) and keratinized tissue thickness (KTT) were measured at baseline and 6 months. The height of the non-carious cervical lesion located on the root and crown were estimated, allowing calculation of root coverage. Results: Both groups showed statistically significant gains in CAL and soft tissue coverage. The differences between groups were not statistically significant for BOP, PD, RGR, CAL, KTW, and KTT after 6 months. The percentages of CLH covered were 56.14% ± 11.74% for CAF+R and 59.78% ± 11.11% for CAF (P>0.05). The root and crown surfaces affected by the non-carious cervical lesion were 1.67 ± 0.31 mm and 0.96 ± 0.29 mm, respectively, for CAF+R and 1.59 ± 0.37 mm and 1.01 ± 0.33 mm, respectively, for CAF. The estimated root coverage was 88.02% ± 19.45% for CAF+R and 97.48% ± 15.36% for CAF (P>0.05). CAF+R reduced DS significantly compared to CAF (P<0.05). Conclusions: Both procedures provided similar soft tissue coverage after 6 months. Despite the fact that a greater reduction in DS was observed after CAF+R, longitudinal observations are necessary to confirm these results.
AB - Background: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the treatment of gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesions by a coronally advanced flap alone (CAF) or in combination with a resin-modified glass ionomer restoration (CAF+R). Methods: Nineteen subjects with bilateral Miller Class I buccal gingival recessions associated with non-carious cervical lesions were selected. The recessions were assigned randomly to receive CAF or CAF+R. Bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), relative gingival recession (RGR), clinical attachment level (CAL), non-carious cervical lesion height (CLH), and dentin sensitivity (DS) were measured at baseline; 45 days; and 2, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Keratinized tissue width (KTW) and keratinized tissue thickness (KTT) were measured at baseline and 6 months. The height of the non-carious cervical lesion located on the root and crown were estimated, allowing calculation of root coverage. Results: Both groups showed statistically significant gains in CAL and soft tissue coverage. The differences between groups were not statistically significant for BOP, PD, RGR, CAL, KTW, and KTT after 6 months. The percentages of CLH covered were 56.14% ± 11.74% for CAF+R and 59.78% ± 11.11% for CAF (P>0.05). The root and crown surfaces affected by the non-carious cervical lesion were 1.67 ± 0.31 mm and 0.96 ± 0.29 mm, respectively, for CAF+R and 1.59 ± 0.37 mm and 1.01 ± 0.33 mm, respectively, for CAF. The estimated root coverage was 88.02% ± 19.45% for CAF+R and 97.48% ± 15.36% for CAF (P>0.05). CAF+R reduced DS significantly compared to CAF (P<0.05). Conclusions: Both procedures provided similar soft tissue coverage after 6 months. Despite the fact that a greater reduction in DS was observed after CAF+R, longitudinal observations are necessary to confirm these results.
KW - Cemento-enamel junction
KW - Gingival recession/surgery
KW - Glass ionomer cement
KW - Randomized controlled clinical trials
KW - Surgical flap
KW - Tooth abrasion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42949173401&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42949173401&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1902/jop.2008.070285
DO - 10.1902/jop.2008.070285
M3 - Article
C2 - 18380554
AN - SCOPUS:42949173401
SN - 0022-3492
VL - 79
SP - 621
EP - 628
JO - Journal of Periodontology
JF - Journal of Periodontology
IS - 4
ER -