Abstract
Background: Breast cancer survivors have an increased risk of second primary cancers (SPCs), the role of county-level socioeconomic status and rurality—factors that may influence access to treatment, surveillance, and preventive care—remains understudied. Methods: We identified 721,957 women with localized/regional first primary breast cancer who survived ≥ 1 year in 17 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries (2000–2018). We used Cox regression to assess associations between county-level median household income (proxy for socioeconomic status), rurality, and their joint effects on invasive SPC risk, adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. We examined risk for all SPCs, non-breast SPCs, and the three most common SPC sites (breast, lung/bronchus, colorectal). Models were further stratified by index breast cancer characteristics. Results: During 6.1 median years of follow-up, 65,954 survivors developed an SPC (42,400 non-breast; 23,554 breast, 8,338 lung/bronchus, 5,442 colorectal). Survivors from lower-income counties had higher SPC risk (< $50,000 vs. ≥ $75,000: HR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.04–1.10), driven by lung/bronchus (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.23–1.42) and colorectal cancers (HR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.09–1.31). Lung/bronchus cancer risk was stronger among younger (age < 50: HR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.59–2.39, age ≥ 50: HR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.12–1.28; p interaction < 0.001) and Estrogen Receptor (ER)-negative survivors (ER negative: HR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.31–1.72; ER positive: HR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.12–1.30; p interaction = 0.02). Survivors from rural counties had higher SPC risk compared with most urban counties (HR range:1.07–1.12), especially for lung/bronchus cancer in younger (age < 50: HR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.34–2.05, age ≥ 50: HR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.06–1.21; p interaction = 0.001) and ER-negative survivors (ER negative: HR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.26–1.67; ER positive: HR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.03–1.20; p interaction = 0.001). Survivors in rural/lower-income counties had the highest SPC risk compared with urban/higher-income counties (HR-range: 1.20–1.23), particularly for lung/bronchus cancer (HR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.10–2.23). Conclusion: Studies are needed to understand factors driving the impact of socioeconomic status and rurality (e.g., access to care) on SPC risk to inform preventive strategies for breast cancer survivors.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1813-1824 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Cancer Causes and Control |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2025.
Funding
Open access funding provided by SCELC, Statewide California Electronic Library Consortium. This study was supported in part by Cedars-Sinai Cancer and the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health. The funder had no role in the design of the study and the collection, analysis, interpretation of the data, and in the writing of the manuscript. KH was supported in part by the NCI T32 CA009314.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| National Institutes of Health (NIH) | |
| SCELC | |
| Statewide California Electronic Library Consortium | |
| Cedars-Sinai Cancer | |
| National Childhood Cancer Registry – National Cancer Institute | T32 CA009314 |
Keywords
- Breast cancer
- Rurality
- Second primary cancer
- Socioeconomic status
- Survivorship
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Oncology
- Cancer Research