TY - JOUR
T1 - Cyberbullying in academic medicine
T2 - A framework for managing social media attacks
AU - Cain, Jeff
AU - Linos, Eleni
AU - Chretien, Katherine C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2019 by the Association of American Medical Colleges
PY - 2019/5/1
Y1 - 2019/5/1
N2 - Criticism, scathing comments, and harassment are becoming more common elements of social media discourse. Recent coordinated public attacks directed at higher education faculty illustrate these troubling trends. In several cases, these attacks have been politically motivated by participants who disagree with a faculty member’s statements regarding sensitive subjects. Whereas most high-profile cases have included faculty teaching at the undergraduate level who use social media to promote scholarly discussion, medical school faculty may also be at risk, especially if their scholarly pursuits pertain to politically charged issues (e.g., race and diversity, firearms, vaccinations, the health of transgender populations). In today’s digital environment of cellphone recordings, forwarded e-mails, and open-access manuscripts, any faculty member who discusses or engages in scholarship of politically sensitive issues on- or offline may be at risk. In this Invited Commentary, the authors discuss the multifaceted problem of cyberbullying of medical school faculty and provide recommendations to faculty and administrators about how to mitigate and manage these situations.
AB - Criticism, scathing comments, and harassment are becoming more common elements of social media discourse. Recent coordinated public attacks directed at higher education faculty illustrate these troubling trends. In several cases, these attacks have been politically motivated by participants who disagree with a faculty member’s statements regarding sensitive subjects. Whereas most high-profile cases have included faculty teaching at the undergraduate level who use social media to promote scholarly discussion, medical school faculty may also be at risk, especially if their scholarly pursuits pertain to politically charged issues (e.g., race and diversity, firearms, vaccinations, the health of transgender populations). In today’s digital environment of cellphone recordings, forwarded e-mails, and open-access manuscripts, any faculty member who discusses or engages in scholarship of politically sensitive issues on- or offline may be at risk. In this Invited Commentary, the authors discuss the multifaceted problem of cyberbullying of medical school faculty and provide recommendations to faculty and administrators about how to mitigate and manage these situations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065348668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065348668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002649
DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002649
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30920444
AN - SCOPUS:85065348668
SN - 1040-2446
VL - 94
SP - 626
EP - 629
JO - Academic Medicine
JF - Academic Medicine
IS - 5
ER -