Defining the long-toss: A professional baseball epidemiological study

  • Austin V. Stone
  • , Sandeep Mannava
  • , Anita Patel
  • , Alejandro Marquez-Lara
  • , Michael T. Freehill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Despite widespread use of long-toss throwing in baseball as a component of arm conditioning, interval throwing programs, and rehabilitation, long-toss distance and throwing mechanics remain controversial. Purpose: To ascertain the perceived definition of long-toss throwing through a survey of professional pitchers, pitching coaches (PCs), and certified athletic trainers (ATCs) associated with Major League Baseball. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: Pitchers, PCs, and ATCs associated with 5 Major League Baseball organizations completed an anonymous survey that collected demographic data, personal use of long-toss throwing, and their perception of the distance and throwing mechanics that comprised long-toss. Results: A total of 321 surveys were completed by 271 pitchers, 19 PCs, and 31 ATCs. For all respondents, the mean distance considered as long-toss was 175 ft (95% CI, 170-181 ft). Respondents categorized the throwing mechanics of long-toss, with 36% reporting throwing “on a line” and 70% reporting long-toss as “not on a line.” Of those throwing “on a line,” 28% reported using crow-hop footwork while 60% used crow-hop footwork when throwing “not on a line.” Interpretation of long-toss distance significantly varied by position: pitchers, 177 ft (95% CI, 171-183 ft); PCs, 177 ft (95% CI, 155-200 ft); and ATCs, 157 ft (95% CI, 144-169 ft) (P =.048). When asked when long-toss throwing is used, pitchers reported using it more frequently in preseason (P =.007), during the season (P =.015), and in the off-season (P =.002) compared with that by ATCs. Functional goals for long-toss throwing demonstrated that pitchers and PCs use long-toss for shoulder stretching more frequently than ATCs (P <.001 and P =.026, respectively). ATCs used long-toss more than pitchers for interval throwing programs (P <.001). Conclusion: The definition varies for long-toss throwing distance and throwing mechanics. Pitchers and PCs believe that longtoss comprised longer distances than ATCs and employed long-toss differently for strength conditioning, training, stretching, and rehabilitation. This discrepancy highlights a potential lost opportunity for protecting the shoulder. While long-toss is an important tool, a more scientific definition is warranted to better elucidate its role in enhancing throwing performance and rehabilitation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2325967116686773
JournalOrthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2017.

Funding

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: This study was internally funded by the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine. A.V.S. receives research support from Smith & Nephew. M.T.F. is a paid consultant and receives research support from Smith & Nephew. S.M. receives research support from Wake Forest Innovations Research Support. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Wake Forest School of Medicine Institutional Review Board.

Funders
Smith & Nephew
Wake Forest Innovations Research Support
Wake Forest School of Medicine
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine

    Keywords

    • Baseball
    • Long-toss
    • Pitchers
    • Pitching
    • Throwing

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Defining the long-toss: A professional baseball epidemiological study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this