TY - JOUR
T1 - Defining the optimal timing of adjuvant therapy for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma
T2 - A statewide cancer registry analysis
AU - Saeed, Hayder
AU - Hnoosh, Dima
AU - Huang, Bin
AU - Durbin, Eric B.
AU - Mcgrath, Patrick C.
AU - Desimone, Philip
AU - Maynard, Erin
AU - Anthony, Lowell B.
AU - Dineen, Sean P.
AU - Hosein, Peter J.
AU - D. Tzeng, Ching Wei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2016/9/15
Y1 - 2016/9/15
N2 - Background: Long-term results of the ESPAC-3 trial suggest that while completing adjuvant therapy (AT) is necessary after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), early initiation (within 8 weeks) may not be associated with improved overall survival (OS). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the OS impact of early versus late AT in a statewide analysis. Methods: Patients with stages I–III PDAC in the Kentucky Cancer Registry (KCR) from 2004 to 2013, were evaluated. Those undergoing pancreatectomy were stratified into two groups (“early,” <8 weeks, vs. “late,” 8–16 weeks). Results: Of 2,221 diagnosed patients with stages I–III, 831 (37.4%) underwent pancreatectomy upfront. Of these, only 420 (50.5%) received AT. Initiation date of AT was not associated with OS (median OS: early, 20.2 vs. late, 19.0 months, P¼0.97). On multivariate analysis, factors that affected OS included stage (II, HR-1.82, P¼0.017; III, HR-3.77, P<0.001), node positivity (HR-1.51, P¼0.004), poorly/undifferentiated grade (HR-1.34; P¼0.011), but not AT initiation date. Conclusions: In this statewide analysis, there was no difference in OS between early and late AT initiation for resected PDAC. The ideal window for AT initiation remains unknown as tumor biology continues to trump regimens from the past decade.
AB - Background: Long-term results of the ESPAC-3 trial suggest that while completing adjuvant therapy (AT) is necessary after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), early initiation (within 8 weeks) may not be associated with improved overall survival (OS). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the OS impact of early versus late AT in a statewide analysis. Methods: Patients with stages I–III PDAC in the Kentucky Cancer Registry (KCR) from 2004 to 2013, were evaluated. Those undergoing pancreatectomy were stratified into two groups (“early,” <8 weeks, vs. “late,” 8–16 weeks). Results: Of 2,221 diagnosed patients with stages I–III, 831 (37.4%) underwent pancreatectomy upfront. Of these, only 420 (50.5%) received AT. Initiation date of AT was not associated with OS (median OS: early, 20.2 vs. late, 19.0 months, P¼0.97). On multivariate analysis, factors that affected OS included stage (II, HR-1.82, P¼0.017; III, HR-3.77, P<0.001), node positivity (HR-1.51, P¼0.004), poorly/undifferentiated grade (HR-1.34; P¼0.011), but not AT initiation date. Conclusions: In this statewide analysis, there was no difference in OS between early and late AT initiation for resected PDAC. The ideal window for AT initiation remains unknown as tumor biology continues to trump regimens from the past decade.
KW - Adjuvant therapy
KW - Delay
KW - Pancreatic adenocarcinoma
KW - Pancreatic cancer
KW - Timing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027948386&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027948386&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jso.24314
DO - 10.1002/jso.24314
M3 - Article
C2 - 27238300
AN - SCOPUS:85027948386
SN - 0022-4790
VL - 114
SP - 451
EP - 455
JO - Journal of Surgical Oncology
JF - Journal of Surgical Oncology
IS - 4
ER -