Desiccation resistance differences in Drosophila species can be largely explained by variations in cuticular hydrocarbons

Zinan Wang, Joseph P. Receveur, Jian Pu, Haosu Cong, Cole Richards, Muxuan Liang, Henry Chung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

Maintaining water balance is a universal challenge for organisms living in terrestrial environments, especially for insects, which have essential roles in our ecosystem. Although the high surface area to volume ratio in insects makes them vulnerable to water loss, insects have evolved different levels of desiccation resistance to adapt to diverse environments. To withstand desiccation, insects use a lipid layer called cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) to reduce water evaporation from the body surface. It has long been hypothesized that the water-proofing capability of this CHC layer, which can confer different levels of desiccation resistance, depends on its chemical composition. However, it is unknown which CHC components are important contributors to desiccation resistance and how these components can determine differences in desiccation resistance. In this study, we used machine-learning algorithms, correlation analyses, and synthetic CHCs to investigate how different CHC components affect desiccation resistance in 50 Drosophila and related species. We showed that desiccation resistance differences across these species can be largely explained by variation in CHC composition. In particular, length variation in a subset of CHCs, the methyl-branched CHCs (mbCHCs), is a key determinant of desiccation resistance. There is also a significant correlation between the evolution of longer mbCHCs and higher desiccation resistance in these species. Given that CHCs are almost ubiquitous in insects, we suggest that evolutionary changes in insect CHC components can be a general mechanism for the evolution of desiccation resistance and adaptation to diverse and changing environments.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere80859
JournaleLife
Volume11
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Wang et al.

Funding

We thank Dr. Jocelyn Millar for guidance and advice, as well as the synthetic compounds used in this study. We also thank Ye Ma, Elaina Giannetti, Taylor Hori, and Zhuo Chen for technical assistance, Yuzhang Shan for assistance with figure visualization, and the National Drosophila Species Stock Center for fly stocks of these different Drosophila species. This work is supported by a National Science Foundation grant (2054773) to H Chung.

FundersFunder number
U.S. Department of Energy Chinese Academy of Sciences Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project Oak Ridge National Laboratory Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment National Science Foundation National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center National Natural Science Foundation of China2054773

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Neuroscience
    • General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
    • General Immunology and Microbiology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Desiccation resistance differences in Drosophila species can be largely explained by variations in cuticular hydrocarbons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this