Abstract
In-line process measurements of pH, temperature, density, and viscosity can be used as inputs for heuristic models to provide an accurate calculation of alkalinity, carbon loading, and degradation of amine solvents used in CO2 capture processes. The accuracy of calculated alkalinity and carbon loading is comparable to repeated off-line sample analyses with similar measurement variations. By incorporating these models into process control software, real-time monitoring of critical physical parameters can be achieved. This can allow for fast process optimization, neural network integration, and instantaneous feedback without the need for regular, costly, and arduous off-line analysis. The aim of this paper is to lay the foundational groundwork for advanced process control schemes for CO2 capture processes with a focus on dynamic operation to match production demands. The models follow amine chemistry, as an amine solvent captures CO2, its carbon loading increases, pH decreases, and density increases. Adjusting for temperature, a correlation can be made between carbon loading and pH. Alkalinity can be calculated by correlating density, temperature, and the carbon loading model output. Total degradation can be calculated with viscosity measurements and alkalinity model outputs, with comparison to known results. Using least-squared methods, the carbon to nitrogen ratio (C/N), alkalinity, and degradation calculations were found to be within 7.27 %, 4.02 %, and ± 2000 ppm of the measured values, respectively. These models have been implemented at the UK 0.7 MWe small pilot CO2 capture plant and were successful in delivering accurate real-time calculations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 104394 |
| Journal | International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control |
| Volume | 145 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025
Funding
This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number DE-FE0031604, the authors would like to acknowledge the U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory (U.S. DOE, NETL) for the primary financial support. The additional support provided by Pennsylvania Power & Light (PPL), Duke Energy, Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. (EPRI), Kentucky Power and the Kentucky Department for Energy Development and Independence (KY DEDI) is also very much appreciated. The authors would like to thank the UK IDEA technical and operations team including Len Goodpaster and Marshall Marcum.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Kentucky Department for Energy Development and Independence | |
| IDEA technical and operations team including Len Goodpaster and Marshall Marcum | |
| Electric Power Research Institute, Louisville Gas & Electric | |
| Duke Energy | |
| Pennsylvania Power & Light | |
| National Energy Technology Laboratory | |
| East Kentucky Power Cooperative | |
| U.S. Department of Energy EPSCoR | DE-FE0031604 |
Keywords
- CO capture
- Carbon dioxide
- Controls
- Loading capacity
- Pilot plant
- Solvent properties
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pollution
- General Energy
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering