TY - JOUR
T1 - Did we push dental ceramics too far? A brief history of ceramic dental implants
AU - Haubenreich, James E.
AU - Robinson, Fonda G.
AU - West, Karen P.
AU - Frazer, Robert Q.
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - Humankind has developed and used ceramics throughout history. It currently has widespread industrial applications. Dental ceramics are used for fabricating highly esthetic prosthetic denture teeth, crowns, and inlays. However, ceramic's biocompatibility and compressive strength are offset by its hardness and brittleness. Nonetheless, a single crystal sapphire aluminum oxide endosseous implant was developed in 1972 as an alternative to metal. It was more esthetic than its metallic counterparts and was eventually produced in a variety of shapes and sizes. Clinical studies demonstrated its excellent soft and hard tissue biocompatibility, yet the range of problems included fractures during surgery, fractures after loading, mobility, infection, pain, bone loss, and lack of osseointegration. Ultimately, single crystal sapphire implants fell into irredeemable disfavor because of its poor impact strength, and dentists and surgeons eventually turned to other implant materials. However, bioactive ceramic coatings on metal implants have kept ceramics as a key component in dental implantology.
AB - Humankind has developed and used ceramics throughout history. It currently has widespread industrial applications. Dental ceramics are used for fabricating highly esthetic prosthetic denture teeth, crowns, and inlays. However, ceramic's biocompatibility and compressive strength are offset by its hardness and brittleness. Nonetheless, a single crystal sapphire aluminum oxide endosseous implant was developed in 1972 as an alternative to metal. It was more esthetic than its metallic counterparts and was eventually produced in a variety of shapes and sizes. Clinical studies demonstrated its excellent soft and hard tissue biocompatibility, yet the range of problems included fractures during surgery, fractures after loading, mobility, infection, pain, bone loss, and lack of osseointegration. Ultimately, single crystal sapphire implants fell into irredeemable disfavor because of its poor impact strength, and dentists and surgeons eventually turned to other implant materials. However, bioactive ceramic coatings on metal implants have kept ceramics as a key component in dental implantology.
KW - Alumina oxide ceramics
KW - Dental ceramics
KW - Endosseous implant
KW - Single crystal sapphire implant
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645227492&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645227492&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v15.i6.50
DO - 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v15.i6.50
M3 - Review article
C2 - 16393130
AN - SCOPUS:33645227492
SN - 1050-6934
VL - 15
SP - 617
EP - 628
JO - Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants
JF - Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants
IS - 6
ER -