Differential Diagnosis of Attention Deficit and Conduct Disorders Using Conditional Probabilities

Richard Milich, Thomas A. Widiger, Steven Landau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

52 Scopus citations


Attention deficit and conduct disorders require an important yet often difficult differential diagnosis. Prior efforts to determine which symptoms are optimal for making this differential diagnosis have been limited by a reliance on statistics that do not supply the probability of the disorders given a symptom's presence (positive predictive power) or the probability that the disorder is not present given the absence of the symptom (negative predictive power). This investigation examined the utility of these latter statistics in the differential diagnosis of childhood attention deficit and conduct disorders. The data consisted of symptoms from a standardized maternal psychiatric interview collected for a sample of 76 clinic-referred boys. Results indicated that some symptoms are optimal as inclusion criteria, some as exclusion criteria, some as neither, and some as both. Furthermore, some symptoms that have been traditionally associated with the diagnosis of one disorder were actually found to be more useful in the diagnosis of the other disorder.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)762-767
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Issue number5
StatePublished - Oct 1987

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health


Dive into the research topics of 'Differential Diagnosis of Attention Deficit and Conduct Disorders Using Conditional Probabilities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this