Abstract
To copy or not to copy, to exploit the famous celebrity image or not to exploit it; these are the questions. The message of the modern legal world communicated through multiple voices in the academy is that copying often is perfectly acceptable and even laudable. An artist or designer might conclude that it is both legal and ethical to use whatever you can, use whatever you can get away with, use it until you get sued for using it. Yet plagiarism in the arts and sciences nearly universally is condemned.
This Article proposes an ethical approach to the use of copyrighted works and names, images, and likenesses protected by the right of publicity: DIOS MIO Don’t Include Others’ Stuff or Modify It Obviously.
The advice of this Article reflects the convergence of predominant purpose analysis and transformative/transformation analysis in copyright and right of publicity law that has led to a single set of recommendations for the legal and ethical treatment of protected works and celebrity names, images, and likenesses: seek first to create and not to copy or exploit, and create new expression by obvious modification of the old expression and content.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Journal | Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technolog |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 22 2012 |
Keywords
- copyright
- right of publicity
- ethics
- plagiarism
- fair use exploitation
- transformation
- transformative test
- ethical use