Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and Recurrent VTE in Patients with Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Deborah Schrag
  • , Hajime Uno
  • , Rachel Rosovsky
  • , Cynthia Rutherford
  • , Kristen Sanfilippo
  • , John L. Villano
  • , Monic Drescher
  • , Nagesh Jayaram
  • , Chris Holmes
  • , Lawrence Feldman
  • , Ottavia Zattra
  • , Haley Farrar-Muir
  • , Christine Cronin
  • , Ethan Basch
  • , Anna Weiss
  • , Jean M. Connors

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

113 Scopus citations

Abstract

Importance: In patients with cancer who have venous thromboembolism (VTE) events, long-term anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended to prevent recurrent VTE. The effectiveness of a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) compared with LMWH for preventing recurrent VTE in patients with cancer is uncertain. Objective: To evaluate DOACs, compared with LMWH, for preventing recurrent VTE and for rates of bleeding in patients with cancer following an initial VTE event. Design, Setting, and Participants: Unblinded, comparative effectiveness, noninferiority randomized clinical trial conducted at 67 oncology practices in the US that enrolled 671 patients with cancer (any invasive solid tumor, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia) who had a new clinical or radiological diagnosis of VTE. Enrollment occurred from December 2016 to April 2020. Final follow-up was in November 2020. Intervention: Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either a DOAC (n = 335) or LMWH (n = 336) and were followed up for 6 months or until death. Physicians and patients selected any DOAC or any LMWH (or fondaparinux) and physicians selected drug doses. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the recurrent VTE rate at 6 months. Noninferiority of anticoagulation with a DOAC vs LMWH was defined by the upper limit of the 1-sided 95% CI for the difference of a DOAC relative to LMWH of less than 3% in the randomized cohort that received at least 1 dose of assigned treatment. The 6 prespecified secondary outcomes included major bleeding, which was assessed using a 2.5% noninferiority margin. Results: Between December 2016 and April 2020, 671 participants were randomized and 638 (95%) completed the trial (median age, 64 years; 353 women [55%]). Among those randomized to a DOAC, 330 received at least 1 dose. Among those randomized to LMWH, 308 received at least 1 dose. Rates of recurrent VTE were 6.1% in the DOAC group and 8.8% in the LMWH group (difference, -2.7%; 1-sided 95% CI, -100% to 0.7%) consistent with the prespecified noninferiority criterion. Of 6 prespecified secondary outcomes, none were statistically significant. Major bleeding occurred in 5.2% of participants in the DOAC group and 5.6% in the LMWH group (difference, -0.4%; 1-sided 95% CI, -100% to 2.5%) and did not meet the noninferiority criterion. Severe adverse events occurred in 33.8% of participants in the DOAC group and 35.1% in the LMWH group. The most common serious adverse events were anemia and death. Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with cancer and VTE, DOACs were noninferior to LMWH for preventing recurrent VTE over 6-month follow-up. These findings support use of a DOAC to prevent recurrent VTE in patients with cancer. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02744092.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1924-1933
Number of pages10
JournalJAMA
Volume329
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 13 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Funding

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Schrag reported receipt of nonfinancial support from Grail and Genentech/Roche and personal fees from Pfizer. Dr Rosovsky reported receipt of grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and Janssen to her institution and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Abbott, Inari, Dova, and Penumbra. Dr Sanfilippo reported receipt of grants from the American Cancer Society and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; personal fees for expert case review from Covington & Burling LLP and Quinn Johnston; personal fees from Health Services Advisory Group; and research funds paid to her organization from Astellas Pharma and AstraZeneca. Dr Holmes reported receipt of grants from the National Institutes of Health. Dr Weiss reported a sponsored institutional research agreement with Myriad Laboratories. Dr Connors reported receipt of personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Anthos, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Werfern, Alnylam, Regeneron, and Abbott and research funding to her institution from CSL Behring. No other disclosures were reported. Funding/Support: The trial was sponsored by Alliance Foundation Trials LLC and supported by a grant from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) (award CER-1503-29805).

FundersFunder number
Alliance Foundation Trials LLC
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
American Cancer Society-Michigan Cancer Research Fund
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Astellas Pharma Inc.
AstraZeneca
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteCER-1503-29805

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and Recurrent VTE in Patients with Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this