Disentangling morphology and genetics in two voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus and M. ochrogaster) in a region of sympatry

Kathryn M. Everson, Robert C. McGinnis, Olivia P. Burdine, Taniece R. Huddleston, Tyler M. Hylick, Audrey L. Keith, Savannah C. Moore, Aidan E. O'Brien, Ava L. Vilardo, James J. Krupa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Species in recent, rapid radiations can be difficult to distinguish from one another due to incomplete sorting of traits, insufficient time for novel morphologies to evolve, and elevated rates of hybridization and gene flow. The vole genus Microtus (58 spp.) is one such system where all three factors are likely at play. In the central United States, the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster, and the eastern meadow vole, M. pennsylvanicus, occur in sympatry and can be distinguished on the basis of molar cusp patterns but are known to be exceptionally difficult to distinguish using external morphological characters. Using a combination of morphometrics, pelage color analyses, and phylogenetics, we explored which traits are most effective for species identification and whether these same traits can be used to identify the subspecies M. o. ohionensis. While we were able to identify six traits that differed significantly between M. ochrogaster and M. pennsylvanicus, we also found substantial measurement overlap which limits the utility of these traits for species identification. The subspecies M. o. ohionensis was particularly difficult to distinguish from M. p. pennsylvanicus, and we did not find any evidence that this subspecies forms a distinct genetic clade. Furthermore, the full species M. ochrogaster and M. pennsylvanicus did not form reciprocal clades in phylogenetic analyses. We discuss several possible reasons for these patterns, including unrecognized variation in molar cusp patterns and/or localized hybridization. Overall, our results provide useful information that will aid in the identification of these species and subspecies in the future, and provides a case study of how genetics, morphometrics, and fur color analyses can be used to disentangle signatures of evolutionary history and hybridization.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)532-545
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Mammalogy
Volume104
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Mammalogists,.

Funding

This project was conducted as part of the University of Kentucky’s STEMCats program: a living-learning program for undergraduate students. STEMCats is funded in part by a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Sustaining Excellence Grant (#52008116) awarded to the University of Kentucky (V.M. Cassone, principal investigator). We are grateful to the following individuals for their input on this manuscript: M. Donohue, Z. Hertz, C. Kerrick, N. Daniel, and D. Weisrock. Specimens used in this study are currently housed in the University of Kentucky Vertebrate Teaching Collection with eventual deposition in the Field Museum of Natural History.

FundersFunder number
University of Kentucky

    Keywords

    • Cricetidae
    • Microtus
    • genetics
    • integrative taxonomy
    • morphometrics
    • phylogenetics
    • spectrophotometry
    • systematics

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
    • Ecology
    • Animal Science and Zoology
    • Genetics
    • Nature and Landscape Conservation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Disentangling morphology and genetics in two voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus and M. ochrogaster) in a region of sympatry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this