Abstract
This study evaluated the dislodgement push-out resistance of five bioceramic materials. One hundred single-rooted teeth with one canal had the apical 3 mm and crown resected to create a 14 mm standardized length. The canals were instrumented to an apical size 80 with a 3 mm root-end preparation made with ultrasonic diamonds. The prepared roots were randomly divided into 5 root-end restorative groups (n=20). ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, EndoSequence Root Repair Material, EndoSequence Fast Set Putty, and EndoSequence BC Sealer with each material placed following manufacturer’s instructions and stored at 100% humidity for 2 weeks. An apical-to-coronal static testing load with the identified dislodgement force converted into MPa with mean results analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post hoc tests (α=0.05). ProRoot MTA and Biodentine displayed similar push-out stress resistance and exhibited significantly greater stress resistance than the similar Endosequence materials. However, all materials failed cohesively and were not dislodged from the root canal surface.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | dmj/2022-058 |
Pages (from-to) | 843-849 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Dental Materials Journal |
Volume | 41 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022, Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices. All rights reserved.
Keywords
- Bioceramics
- Endodontic apical surgery
- Hydraulic cements
- Push out resistance
- Root end filling
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Ceramics and Composites
- General Dentistry