Dissemination of evidence from systematic reviews through academic CME providers: A feasibility study

Michael Fordis, Jason E. King, Francesca Bonaduce de Nigris, Robert Morrow, Robert B. Baron, John R. Kues, James C. Norton, Harold Kessler, Paul E. Mazmanian, Lois Colburn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations


Introduction: Although systematic reviews represent a source of best evidence to support clinical decision-making, reviews are underutilized by clinicians. Barriers include lack of awareness, familiarity, and access. Efforts to promote utilization have focused on reaching practicing clinicians, leaving unexplored the roles of continuing medical education (CME) directors and faculty in promoting systematic review use. This study explored the feasibility of working with CME directors and faculty for that purpose. Methods: A convenience sample of five academic CME directors and faculty agreed to participate in a feasibility study exploring use in CME courses of systematic reviews from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ-SRs). AHRQ-SR topics addressed the comparative effectiveness of health care options. Participants received access to AHRQ-SR reports, associated summary products, and instructional resources. The feasibility study used mixed methods to assess 1) implementation of courses incorporating SR evidence, 2) identification of facilitators and barriers to integration, and 3) acceptability to CME directors, faculty, and learners. Results: Faculty implemented 14 CME courses of varying formats serving 1700 learners in urban, suburban, and rural settings. Facilitators included credibility, conciseness of messages, and availability of supporting materials; potential barriers included faculty unfamiliarity with SRs, challenges in maintaining review currency, and review scope. SR evidence and summary products proved acceptable to CME directors, course faculty, and learners by multiple measures. Discussion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of approaches to use AHRQ-SRs in CME courses/programming. Further research is needed to demonstrate generalizability to other types of CME providers and other systemic reviews.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)104-112
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Alliance for Continuing Education in the Health Professions, the Association for Hospital Medical Education, and the Society for Academic Continuing Medical Education. All rights reserved.


  • Academic detailing
  • Community of practice/knowledge networks
  • Didactic presentations
  • Evaluationeducational intervention
  • Evidence integration into CME
  • Feasibility
  • Innovative educational interventions
  • Interactive learning
  • Mixed-methods research
  • Program planning/curriculum development
  • Small group/team learning
  • Strategic issues in CME/CPD

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education


Dive into the research topics of 'Dissemination of evidence from systematic reviews through academic CME providers: A feasibility study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this