TY - JOUR
T1 - Documenting the current definitions of chronic pelvic pain
T2 - Implications for research
AU - Williams, Rachel E.
AU - Hartmann, Katherine E.
AU - Steege, John F.
PY - 2004/4
Y1 - 2004/4
N2 - OBJECTIVE: We examined chronic pelvic pain definitions used in published research, because the definition has direct implications for investigating causation and evaluating treatment. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE was searched for published articles in an Abridged Index Medicos journal from 1966 to 2001, restricted to humans, females, and English language. "Chronic pelvic pain" was used as a keyword. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We reviewed 101 abstracts of publications of chronic pelvic pain. Forty-three articles met the criteria of human, female, English language, chronic pelvic pain, and use of an experimental, cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional study design. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: The following were not explicitly specified in the chronic pelvic pain definitions in these articles: duration of pain in 44%, restriction by pathology in 74%, location of pain in 93%, restriction by comorbidity in 95%, and additional inclusion/exclusion criteria in 65%. CONCLUSION: We conclude that an explicit chronic pelvic pain definition is not used for research of this population. The use of a poor operational chronic pelvic pain research definition reduces the ability to investigate causation and improve treatment of this condition.
AB - OBJECTIVE: We examined chronic pelvic pain definitions used in published research, because the definition has direct implications for investigating causation and evaluating treatment. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE was searched for published articles in an Abridged Index Medicos journal from 1966 to 2001, restricted to humans, females, and English language. "Chronic pelvic pain" was used as a keyword. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We reviewed 101 abstracts of publications of chronic pelvic pain. Forty-three articles met the criteria of human, female, English language, chronic pelvic pain, and use of an experimental, cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional study design. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: The following were not explicitly specified in the chronic pelvic pain definitions in these articles: duration of pain in 44%, restriction by pathology in 74%, location of pain in 93%, restriction by comorbidity in 95%, and additional inclusion/exclusion criteria in 65%. CONCLUSION: We conclude that an explicit chronic pelvic pain definition is not used for research of this population. The use of a poor operational chronic pelvic pain research definition reduces the ability to investigate causation and improve treatment of this condition.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2342510403&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2342510403&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/01.AOG.0000115513.92318.b7
DO - 10.1097/01.AOG.0000115513.92318.b7
M3 - Review article
C2 - 15051560
AN - SCOPUS:2342510403
SN - 0029-7844
VL - 103
SP - 686
EP - 691
JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology
JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology
IS - 4
ER -