TY - JOUR
T1 - Does a systematic vocal exercise program enhance the physiologic range of voice production in classical singing graduate-level students?
AU - Guzman, Marco
AU - Angadi, Vrushali
AU - Croake, Daniel
AU - Catalan, Christopher
AU - Romero, Constanza
AU - Acuña, Gabriela
AU - Quezada, Camilo
AU - Andreatta, Richard
AU - Stemple, Joseph
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
PY - 2020/4
Y1 - 2020/4
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of vocal function exercises (VFEs) on the physiologic range of the operatic voice. The primary outcome measure was total voice range profile (VRP) area. Method: Forty graduate-level opera majors were randomly assigned to experimental (training with VFE + vocal hygiene) and control (vocal hygiene only) groups. All participants underwent an acoustic voice assessment (modified VRP) pre and post 10 weeks of the assigned intervention. VRP total area was calculated and compared between and within the two groups. The total VRP area was subsequently divided into three area thirds (low, medium, and high). Results: A significant improvement (increase) was observed in the VFE group for the primary outcome measure of VRP area when pre-and postvoice conditions were compared for total area, upper third, and middle third. No significant improvement was found in the vocal hygiene-only group. Conclusion: Vocal training with VFEs over a 10-week period demonstrated positive effects on physiologic voice range as evidenced by an increase in the total VRP area and therefore may enhance the potential of those who already have professional voice training.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of vocal function exercises (VFEs) on the physiologic range of the operatic voice. The primary outcome measure was total voice range profile (VRP) area. Method: Forty graduate-level opera majors were randomly assigned to experimental (training with VFE + vocal hygiene) and control (vocal hygiene only) groups. All participants underwent an acoustic voice assessment (modified VRP) pre and post 10 weeks of the assigned intervention. VRP total area was calculated and compared between and within the two groups. The total VRP area was subsequently divided into three area thirds (low, medium, and high). Results: A significant improvement (increase) was observed in the VFE group for the primary outcome measure of VRP area when pre-and postvoice conditions were compared for total area, upper third, and middle third. No significant improvement was found in the vocal hygiene-only group. Conclusion: Vocal training with VFEs over a 10-week period demonstrated positive effects on physiologic voice range as evidenced by an increase in the total VRP area and therefore may enhance the potential of those who already have professional voice training.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083838131&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85083838131&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00362
DO - 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00362
M3 - Article
C2 - 32293967
AN - SCOPUS:85083838131
SN - 1092-4388
VL - 63
SP - 1044
EP - 1052
JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
IS - 4
ER -