Does Predisposition Toward Disgust Affect Emotional Response to Political Leaders? Evidence from the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election

Patrick A. Stewart, Jamilah R. George, Thomas Adams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: We explore the effects of trait disgust sensitivity and induced disgust on emotional response to political leaders. We assert that disgust sensitivity, especially in response to pathogen-based stimuli (e.g., insects, feces, and vomit), will affect an individual's interaction with his or her political environment, including political leaders. Methods: We analyze the effect of individual predispositions in response to stimuli indicating the presence of pathogens on emotional response to President Barack Obama, as well as his Republican challenger during the 2012 election, Mitt Romney. Study 1 utilizes cross-sectional data to determine how disgust sensitivity relates to how President Obama made respondents feel. Study 2 analyzes experimental data considering the effect of a disgusting odorant (butyric acid) on emotional response to Obama and Romney. Results: Findings suggest disgust plays an important role in emotional response to political leaders both through trait sensitivity and when induced and it is particularly relevant to emotional responses to President Obama. Conclusions: Disgust, both as a trait sensitivity and as experimentally induced by an odorant, influences emotional response to the political environment, including high-profile political leaders.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2033-2046
Number of pages14
JournalSocial Science Quarterly
Volume100
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by the Southwestern Social Science Association

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does Predisposition Toward Disgust Affect Emotional Response to Political Leaders? Evidence from the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this