Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dominant glacial landforms of the lower Great Lakes region exhibit different soil phosphorus chemistry and potential risk for phosphorus loss

  • Janina M. Plach
  • , Merrin L. Macrae
  • , Mark R. Williams
  • , Brad D. Lee
  • , Kevin W. King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) losses from agricultural soils are a growing economic and water-quality concern in the Lake Erie watershed. While recent studies have explored edge-of-field and watershed P losses related to land-use and agricultural management, the potential for soils developed from contrasting parent materials to retain or release P to runoff has not been examined. A field-based study comparing eight agricultural fields in contrasting glacial landscapes (hummocky coarse-textured till-plain, lacustrine and fine-textured till-plain) showed distinct physical and geochemical soil properties influencing inorganic P (Pi) partitioning throughout the soil profile between the two regions. Fields located on the coarse-textured till-plain in mid-western Ontario, Canada had alkaline calcareous soils with the highest Total-Pi concentrations and the majority of soil Pi stored in an acid-soluble pool (up to 91%). In contrast, loosely to moderately soluble Pi concentrations were higher in soils of the lacustrine and fine-textured till-plain in southwestern Ontario, northeast Indiana and northwestern Ohio, US. Overall, soils on the lacustrine and fine-textured till-plain had a greater shrink swell-capacity, likely creating preferential flow to minimize Pi interaction with the more acidic, lower carbonate and lower sorption capacity soils. These differences in soil Pi retention and transport pathways demonstrate that in addition to management, the natural landscape may exert a significant control on how Pi is mobilized throughout the Lake Erie watershed. Further, results indicate that careful consideration of region-specific hydrology and soil biogeochemistry may be required when designing appropriate management strategies to minimize Pi losses across the lower Great Lakes region.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1057-1067
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Great Lakes Research
Volume44
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 International Association for Great Lakes Research

Funding

This project was funded in part through Growing Forward 2 (AAC GF2 0419 ), a federal-provincial-territorial initiative. The Agricultural Adaptation Council assists in the delivery of GF2 in Ontario. This research was also funded in part through Grain Farmers of Ontario and Land Improvement Contractors of Ontario (LICO) ( C2016AG04 ). Logistical support was kindly provided by B. Bertram, B. McIntosh, K. Nixon, L. Taylor, P. Levison and Yvonne Thompson. This project was funded in part through Growing Forward 2 (AAC GF2 0419), a federal-provincial-territorial initiative. The Agricultural Adaptation Council assists in the delivery of GF2 in Ontario. This research was also funded in part through Grain Farmers of Ontario and Land Improvement Contractors of Ontario (LICO) (C2016AG04). Logistical support was kindly provided by B. Bertram, B. McIntosh, K. Nixon, L. Taylor, P. Levison and Yvonne Thompson.

FundersFunder number
LICOC2016AG04
Grain Farmers of Ontario
Agricultural Adaptation Council

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
      SDG 2 Zero Hunger
    2. SDG 15 - Life on Land
      SDG 15 Life on Land

    Keywords

    • Agriculture
    • Great Lakes
    • Phosphorus
    • Soil geochemistry
    • Water quality

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
    • Aquatic Science
    • Ecology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Dominant glacial landforms of the lower Great Lakes region exhibit different soil phosphorus chemistry and potential risk for phosphorus loss'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this