Abstract
The authors discuss aspects of the decision-making process for including 'new' diagnostic categories in DSM-IV. They detail the different kinds of new categories proposed for inclusion in DSM-IV and discuss the risks and benefits of incorporating them. The authors comment on whether new diagnostic categories should be included in official nosologies as a stimulus for research or as a culmination of research. They also highlight problems with 'sunsetting' diagnoses. The criteria for change in DSM-IV-a way to deal with the expanding array of proposals for additional diagnostic entities-are discussed. The authors also offer a series of specific examples of the different kinds of new categories being considered for inclusion in DSM-IV.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 112-117 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | American Journal of Psychiatry |
| Volume | 149 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1992 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Psychiatry and Mental health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'DSM-IV and new diagnostic categories: Holding the line on proliferation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver