TY - JOUR
T1 - Economic impact of drug-eluting stents on hospital systems
T2 - A disease-state model
AU - Kong, David F.
AU - Eisenstein, Eric L.
AU - Sketch, Michael H.
AU - Zidar, James P.
AU - Ryan, Thomas J.
AU - Harrington, Robert A.
AU - Newman, Mark F.
AU - Smith, Peter K.
AU - Mark, Daniel B.
AU - Califf, Robert M.
PY - 2004/3
Y1 - 2004/3
N2 - Background Drug-eluting intracoronary stents decrease restenosis and later revascularization. The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), recognizing the financial and clinical impact of this technology, recently proposed accelerated reimbursement to hospitals. Methods and results A disease state-transition computer model simulated the clinical and economic consequences to hospitals of drug-eluting stents over 5 years. Model parameters combined information from a longitudinal clinical database, a hospital cost-accounting system, and a survey instrument. Simulations were repeated 1000 times for each set of parameters. With 85% of stent procedures shifted to drug-eluting stents in the first year of availability, the mean number of repeat revascularizations dropped by 60.4% at year 5. With no changes in reimbursement policy, a hospital with a catheterization laboratory volume of 3112 patients yearly converted from a $2.01 million (M) annual profit to an $8.10 M loss in the first year (95% CI $8.09 M to $8.12 M) and $8.7 M annual losses in later years. This represented an overall change in cash flow of $55.71 M (95% CI $55.66 M to $55.76 M) away from the hospital over 5 years. The incremental reimbursement proposed by HHS reduced this loss to $4.75 M in the first year and to $5.6 M annually thereafter. In sensitivity analyses, the conversion of patients from bypass surgery to drug-eluting stents was the largest driver of overall cash flow shifts. Conclusions Although Medicare has proposed to increase reimbursement to ease the impact of drug-eluting stents on hospitals, this increase will not totally offset the costs.
AB - Background Drug-eluting intracoronary stents decrease restenosis and later revascularization. The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), recognizing the financial and clinical impact of this technology, recently proposed accelerated reimbursement to hospitals. Methods and results A disease state-transition computer model simulated the clinical and economic consequences to hospitals of drug-eluting stents over 5 years. Model parameters combined information from a longitudinal clinical database, a hospital cost-accounting system, and a survey instrument. Simulations were repeated 1000 times for each set of parameters. With 85% of stent procedures shifted to drug-eluting stents in the first year of availability, the mean number of repeat revascularizations dropped by 60.4% at year 5. With no changes in reimbursement policy, a hospital with a catheterization laboratory volume of 3112 patients yearly converted from a $2.01 million (M) annual profit to an $8.10 M loss in the first year (95% CI $8.09 M to $8.12 M) and $8.7 M annual losses in later years. This represented an overall change in cash flow of $55.71 M (95% CI $55.66 M to $55.76 M) away from the hospital over 5 years. The incremental reimbursement proposed by HHS reduced this loss to $4.75 M in the first year and to $5.6 M annually thereafter. In sensitivity analyses, the conversion of patients from bypass surgery to drug-eluting stents was the largest driver of overall cash flow shifts. Conclusions Although Medicare has proposed to increase reimbursement to ease the impact of drug-eluting stents on hospitals, this increase will not totally offset the costs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2342423261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2342423261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.11.005
DO - 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.11.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 14999193
AN - SCOPUS:2342423261
SN - 0002-8703
VL - 147
SP - 449
EP - 456
JO - American Heart Journal
JF - American Heart Journal
IS - 3
ER -