Effects of supplemental ruminally degradable protein versus increasing amounts of supplemental ruminally undegradable protein on nitrogen retention, apparent digestibility, and nutrient flux across visceral tissues in lambs fed low-quality forage

R. L. Atkinson, C. D. Toone, T. J. Robinson, D. L. Harmon, P. A. Ludden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to determine effects of supplemental ruminally degradable protein (RDP) vs. increasing amounts of supplemental ruminally undegradable protein (RUP) on intake, apparent digestibility, N retention, and nutrient flux across visceral tissues in lambs fed low-quality forage. Lambs were fed a basal diet of crested wheatgrass hay (4.2% CP) for ad libitum consumption, plus 1 of 4 protein supplements: isolated soy protein (RDP source) fed to meet estimated RDP requirements (CON), or corn gluten meal (RUP source) fed at 50, 100, or 150% of the supplemental N provided by CON (C50, C100, and C150, respectively). In Exp. 1, 12 lambs (29.9 ± 2.7 kg) were used. Forage OM intake was not affected (P = 0.46) by protein degradability or by increasing RUP (P ≥ 0.31). Apparent total tract OM digestibility was not affected (P = 0.10) by protein degradability, but increased (P ≤ 0.004) with increasing RUP. Urinary N excretion was not affected (P = 0.20) by protein degradability, but increased (P ≤ 0.006) with increasing RUP. Similarly, N retention (g/d) was not affected (P = 0.69) by protein degradability, but increased (P = 0.001) as RUP increased. However, N retention (% of digested N) was not affected (P ≥ 0.40) by protein degradability or level of RUP. In Exp. 2, 16 catheterized lambs (32 ± 5 kg) were used. Net release of ammonia-N from the portal-drained viscera (PDV) was greater (P = 0.02) for CON than for C100 and increased linearly (P = 0.002) as RUP increased. Net uptake of ammonia-N by liver was not affected (P = 0.23) by protein degradability, but increased linearly (P = 0.04) as RUP increased. Net urea-N release from liver was not affected (P ≥ 0.49) by protein degradability or level of RUP. Net uptake of urea-N by PDV was greater (P = 0.02) for C100 compared with CON and increased (P = 0.04) with increasing RUP. Neither net release from PDV nor hepatic uptake of α-amino N were affected (P ≥ 0.12) by protein degradability or level of RUP. Hepatic ammonia-N uptake accounted for 82, 38, 98, and 79% of net urea-N release from the liver for CON, C50, C100, and C150, respectively. Hepatic α-amino N uptake for all treatments greatly exceeded that required for the remaining urea-N release by the liver, suggesting that α-amino N may serve as a temporary means of storing excess N by liver between supplementation events. The pattern of net release or uptake of N metabolites between supplementation events requires further investigation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3331-3339
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Animal Science
Volume85
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2007

Keywords

  • Growing lamb
  • Nitrogen retention
  • Nutrient flux
  • Ruminally undegradable protein

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Genetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of supplemental ruminally degradable protein versus increasing amounts of supplemental ruminally undegradable protein on nitrogen retention, apparent digestibility, and nutrient flux across visceral tissues in lambs fed low-quality forage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this