TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of various commercially available enrichment options on handling and chronic stress markers in female ICR mice
AU - Peveler, Jessica L.
AU - Swan, Melissa P.
AU - Wheeler, R'nld R.
AU - Boehm, Christine A.
AU - Hickman, Debra L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Association for Laboratory Animal Science. All Right Reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Although social housing of mice generally is preferred, mice must be individually housed in some situations. In these cases, enhanced attention to environmental enrichment is encouraged, but few studies assess the wellbeing of mice provided various enrichments. In this study, we used female ICR mice to evaluate enrichment strategies that encouraged natural behaviors including foraging, exercise, sheltering, and socialization. After 3 mo of exposure to the assigned enrichment strategy, wellbeing was assessed by evaluating behavioral and physiologic differences between groups. The results suggested that the use of red-tinted igloos may decrease markers of mouse wellbeing. However, none of the selected strategies yielded measures of wellbeing indicating improvement as compared to individually housed mice with no enrichment (negative control). Furthermore, measures were not significantly different between paired mice and individually housed mice with no enrichment.
AB - Although social housing of mice generally is preferred, mice must be individually housed in some situations. In these cases, enhanced attention to environmental enrichment is encouraged, but few studies assess the wellbeing of mice provided various enrichments. In this study, we used female ICR mice to evaluate enrichment strategies that encouraged natural behaviors including foraging, exercise, sheltering, and socialization. After 3 mo of exposure to the assigned enrichment strategy, wellbeing was assessed by evaluating behavioral and physiologic differences between groups. The results suggested that the use of red-tinted igloos may decrease markers of mouse wellbeing. However, none of the selected strategies yielded measures of wellbeing indicating improvement as compared to individually housed mice with no enrichment (negative control). Furthermore, measures were not significantly different between paired mice and individually housed mice with no enrichment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062975384&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062975384&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-17-000103
DO - 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-17-000103
M3 - Article
C2 - 30696520
AN - SCOPUS:85062975384
SN - 1559-6109
VL - 58
SP - 119
EP - 125
JO - Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science
JF - Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science
IS - 2
ER -