TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of the NOA® mandibular advancement device in the management of obstructive sleep apnea
T2 - A cohort study
AU - Fernandez-Vial, Diego
AU - Boggero, Ian
AU - Pasha, Sara
AU - Yanez-Regonesi, Fernanda
AU - Vazquez-Delgado, Eduardo
AU - Okeson, Jeffrey
AU - Moreno-Hay, Isabel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy, compliance, and side effects of the NOA® device compared to other mandibular advancement devices (MADs) in managing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods: Thirty-three participants using the NOA® device were evaluated based on apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) reduction (criterion I: >50% reduction of AHI or criterion II: residual AHI < 5 events/hour), compliance, temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), and patient-reported side effects. These data were compared to retrospective data of 59 patients receiving a different MAD. Results: Results showed that the NOA® device was effective in 78.8% (criterion 1) and 90.9% (criterion 2) of cases, requiring less mandibular advancement than other MADs. Participants used the device for an average of 6.94 ± 0.97 hours per night. Significant improvements were noted in morning headaches, sleep bruxism, and nocturnal urination. Conclusions: The NOA® device demonstrated high efficacy, improved patient-reported outcomes, and caused no significant side effects or issues. It required less mandibular advancement than other devices and had high patient compliance.
AB - Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy, compliance, and side effects of the NOA® device compared to other mandibular advancement devices (MADs) in managing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods: Thirty-three participants using the NOA® device were evaluated based on apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) reduction (criterion I: >50% reduction of AHI or criterion II: residual AHI < 5 events/hour), compliance, temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), and patient-reported side effects. These data were compared to retrospective data of 59 patients receiving a different MAD. Results: Results showed that the NOA® device was effective in 78.8% (criterion 1) and 90.9% (criterion 2) of cases, requiring less mandibular advancement than other MADs. Participants used the device for an average of 6.94 ± 0.97 hours per night. Significant improvements were noted in morning headaches, sleep bruxism, and nocturnal urination. Conclusions: The NOA® device demonstrated high efficacy, improved patient-reported outcomes, and caused no significant side effects or issues. It required less mandibular advancement than other devices and had high patient compliance.
KW - Sleep apnea
KW - dental sleep medicine
KW - oral appliances
KW - orofacial pain
KW - temporomandibular disorders
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85218182130&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85218182130&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08869634.2025.2461657
DO - 10.1080/08869634.2025.2461657
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85218182130
SN - 0886-9634
JO - Cranio - Journal of Craniomandibular Practice
JF - Cranio - Journal of Craniomandibular Practice
ER -