TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficiency results of MLE and GMM estimation with sampling weights
AU - Butler, J. S.
PY - 2000/5
Y1 - 2000/5
N2 - This paper examines GMM and ML estimation of econometric models and the theory of Hausman tests with sampling weights. Weighted conditional GMM can be more efficient than weighted conditional MLE, an inefficient alternative to full information MLE under choice-based sampling, unless regressions have homoscedastic additive disturbances or sampling weights are independent of exogenous variables. GMM variances are necessarily smaller without sampling weights if GMM is the same as MLE or disturbances are homoscedastic, but not in general. Taking into account the dependence of sampling weights on parameters improves the efficiency of estimation.
AB - This paper examines GMM and ML estimation of econometric models and the theory of Hausman tests with sampling weights. Weighted conditional GMM can be more efficient than weighted conditional MLE, an inefficient alternative to full information MLE under choice-based sampling, unless regressions have homoscedastic additive disturbances or sampling weights are independent of exogenous variables. GMM variances are necessarily smaller without sampling weights if GMM is the same as MLE or disturbances are homoscedastic, but not in general. Taking into account the dependence of sampling weights on parameters improves the efficiency of estimation.
KW - GMM
KW - Heteroscedasticity
KW - MLE
KW - Sampling weights
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0004936015&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0004936015&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00049-4
DO - 10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00049-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0004936015
SN - 0304-4076
VL - 96
SP - 25
EP - 37
JO - Journal of Econometrics
JF - Journal of Econometrics
IS - 1
ER -