Abstract
Introduction: Although the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine recommends that electrodiagnostic procedures should be performed by physicians with specialty training, these procedures are increasingly being performed by non-specialists. Methods: We used a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes who used electrodiagnostic services in 2006 to examine whether specialists and non-specialists were different in the rates of identifying common neuromuscular conditions. Results: Specialists (neurologists and physiatrists) performed 62% of electrodiagnostic consultations; non-specialist physicians and non-physicians performed 31% and 5%, respectively. After adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, diabetes severity, and comorbidities, specialists were 1.26-9 times more likely than nonphysicians to diagnose polyneuropathy, lumbosacral radiculopathy, cervical radiculopathy, carpal tunnel syndrome, and ulnar neuropathy. Almost 80% of electrodiagnostic studies performed by specialists included electromyography testing; fewer than 13% by non-specialists did. Conclusions: Inadequate use of electromyography and fewer specific diagnoses suggest that many non-specialists perform insufficiently comprehensive electrodiagnostic studies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 812-817 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Muscle and Nerve |
Volume | 43 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2011 |
Keywords
- Carpal tunnel syndrome
- Cervical radiculopathy
- Diabetes mellitus
- Electrodiagnostic consultation
- Electromyography
- Lumbosacral radiculopathy
- Nerve conduction
- Polyneuropathy
- Ulnar neuropathy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Physiology
- Clinical Neurology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Physiology (medical)